COAI Seeks Cost-Benefit Details On Trai’s Draft For Pesky Call Norms
Cellular Operators' Association of India has raised concerns over Trai's draft rules to curb pesky calls, stating that they do not effectively deal with pain-points faced by users.
The industry body of large mobile operators has insisted on a “cost-benefit analysis” before financially-stressed telcos are asked to overhaul the existing system.
COAI, in its response to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's proposed regulations to control pesky calls and unwanted telemarketing messages, has also spoken out against imposing financial disincentives on operators.
It said that telecom companies have made all-out efforts to considerably reduce such complaints, and “hence should not be penalised for unwarranted actions of some subscribers”.
"We are of the view that operators have made all efforts that have considerably reduced their unsolicited commercial communication complaints to a very low level and, hence, shouldn't be penalised for unwarranted actions of some subscribers," COAI said in its written submissions to Trai.
Trai, last month, mooted the introduction of blockchain-based framework, apparently the first of its kind in the world, to prevent unauthorised access of subscribers data, and enhance confidentiality. Trai has sought tightening of the rules around unwanted telemarketing calls and messages, and proposed penalty of up to Rs 76 lakh per month on violators.
Mooting a concoction of technology and regulation, and tools to check rule violators, Trai's proposed norms also require third parties to seek customers' consent for the type of messages they wish to receive.
The issue of controlling unwanted telemarketing communication assumes significance as almost 30 billion unsolicited messages are purportedly exchanged each month on telecom networks, as per some sector estimates.
The Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations 2018 draft — for which the regulator has sought public feedback — proposes that mobile subscribers should be able to revoke permission anytime that they have given to a commercial entity through mobile app, website or SMS, and the same should be updated in the blockchain based system within 24 hours.
But outlining its analysis, COAI said that a number of obligations in the draft regulations require operators to plough in money to overhaul the current systems and invest in new technology. This, it said, is at a time when the sector is going through “one of its most disruptive phases”, and reeling under a debt of Rs 7.6 lakh crore.
"Hence we would like to submit that the authority should undertake and provide cost-benefit analysis in consultation with all stakeholders before finalising the draft regulation on unsolicited commercial communications," COAI said.
One of the issues flagged by the industry body includes voice call from unregistered telemarketers, which COAI insists the draft regulation has not effectively addressed.
It said, "The draft regulations do not address the present issues in the existing framework and, hence, the investments and huge processes would be an overhead, without benefiting the consumers or the telecom service providers.”
COAI noted that there is a shift in telemarketing calls to over-the-top (OTT) players like WhatsApp, and noted that “the large scale migration to OTT caused by the complexity of this regulation will render this solution redundant".
The industry association also felt that sub-categories, day and time band preferences indicated by the customers for receiving or stopping receipt of telemarketing calls will be more complex for consumers and lead to complaints and dissatisfaction among users.
It also said that since the new regulation misses the issue of voice calls from unregistered telemarketers, "no financial disincentives should be imposed on the TSPs due to UCC made by customers not registered as telemarketers."
COAI has made a number of suggestions that include at least three months time for finalisation of 'code of practice' by the telecom operators, and also said that solution design and system upgradation under the new norms will take a minimum of nine months, especially given the proposed adoption of “distributed ledger technology or blockchain”.