ADVERTISEMENT

Why Hong Kong-Listed Stocks Can Go On Such Wild Rides

Why Hong Kong-Listed Stocks Can Go On Such Wild Rides

(Bloomberg) -- Hong Kong may be Asia’s premier financial hub and a favorite for U.S. and European stock investors, but away from the big names such as Tencent Holdings Ltd. traders must negotiate unusual practices that might seem out of place for the world’s biggest markets. Here is a list of issues that are worrying some investors and vexing regulators.

1. Sudden stock plunges

Monumental price collapses aren’t unusual: ArtGo Holdings Ltd. and Kasen International Holdings Ltd. each fell more than 90% in a single day in November. A year ago five stocks slumped more than 60% during a single trading session. The phenomenon can afflict groups of firms connected by shareholders or business line, but often there’s no obvious link. A common explanation is the practice of major shareholders pledging shares as collateral for loans, which can result in a lender suddenly dumping stock. The issue for money managers is that there’s no need to disclose such loans, except in limited circumstances, making it hard to assess the risks associated with some stocks and shareholders. Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Director Brian Ho said in late 2018 that some stocks were manipulated upward to qualify for inclusion in indexes.

  • Regulator reaction: The SFC issued new market guidance on Nov. 21 to “remind” listed companies about their disclosure requirements. It noted that some companies failed to sufficiently identify their counterparties or described them in ways that “are not meaningful” for investors to assess risk. Past attempts to widen share pledge disclosure rules failed due to opposition from banks and brokerages.

2. Nefarious networks

Local investors have long been aware of notorious “Lo Tsin” stocks, Cantonese slang for “tricksters.” As described by SFC officials, these can include networks of shares tainted by questionable financial managers, money lenders and brokers who conspire to divert public shareholder wealth into private hands, often by selling and buying assets at huge discounts or overvaluations. Another type, this one involving a web of cross shareholdings, is epitomized by the “Enigma Network,” a name coined by activist investor David Webb who identified links between some 50 firms in May 2017. Many of the companies’ shares plunged in the following months as the regulator and anti-corruption police raided premises and made arrests. Court cases showed alleged efforts to steal tens of millions of dollars from some member firms through elaborate lending scams.

  • Regulator reaction: Six people connected with Convoy Global Holdings Ltd., which was at the center of the Enigma Network, were charged in 2019 with conspiracy to defraud. A Hong Kong court has frozen up to HK$125 million ($16 million) held by 15 local and overseas entities that allegedly stemmed from stock manipulation. The SFC also ordered brokers to freeze client accounts linked to suspected market manipulation. In its Nov. 21 guidance, the regulator expressed concern that various “means are being used to conceal ownership and as part of wider schemes to engage in illicit activities or market misconduct,” and vowed to intervene “in serious cases ... to protect the investing public,” including suspending trading or delisting.

3. Director diligence

Hong Kong has the highest concentration of directors in developed markets, hindering efforts to diversify boards and risking lax corporate oversight by overstretched directors. In 2018 the city had at least 113 companies with a director who served on more than six boards, compared with 39 on the New York Stock Exchange and eight in London, a Bloomberg News analysis showed. (The number in Hong Kong was down to 87 as of Nov. 22, 2019.) Some of the most prolific directors often sit on boards at firms caught up in fraud, huge drops in share prices and regulatory investigations, according to research by Charles Dery of risk management firm Lyra Financial Corp.

  • Regulator reaction: New rules that took effect in 2019 require a company to say why it determined that any new independent, non-executive director already serving on more than six boards “would be able to devote sufficient time” to another. But Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. stopped short of imposing a cap.
Why Hong Kong-Listed Stocks Can Go On Such Wild Rides

4. Post-IPO flips

Heavy demand for backdoor listings by Chinese firms gave rise to one of the quirkier sides of Hong Kong’s capital market: Newly listed public companies changing ownership, and even their type of business, within months of an initial public offering. Regulators suspected firms were going public on false pretenses and that the new owners were trying to evade the scrutiny of an IPO. Typically the companies involved were small or mid caps. The practice became so widespread that speculators pumped the shares of suspected backdoor targets leading to some roller-coaster stock movements.

  • Regulator reaction: New rules from HKEX to “restrict undesirable backdoor listings and shell activities” took effect in October.

5. Low Liquidity

Corporate governance issues aside, Hong Kong’s small and mid cap markets struggle from low volumes and wide spreads. Investors such as Angela Chow, Chief Executive Officer at Cachet Asset Management, worry that even a small stake adjustment can move a stock price, making it easier for bad actors to manipulate the market and discouraging serious investors. Short-selling, which adds scrutiny to companies, is also limited in Hong Kong to firms with a large market capitalization. Officials at HKEX have often spoken about ways to improve trading volumes though most changes require regulatory or government approval.

  • Regulator reaction: The SFC and government are waiting for HKEX to submit formal proposals.

6. Small-cap IPO pops and repeat rights issues

Areas that the regulator and exchange appear to have nixed are the phenomena of extraordinary first-day gains in small-cap IPOs (this one rose 1,500 percent) and repeat rights issues (such as the company that planned an eighth in five years after wiping out 99.99 percent of its original value).

  • Regulator reaction: Following several rule changes and enforcement action these practices have largely disappeared, the SFC’s Ho said in late 2018.

The Reference Shelf

  • One Hong Kong doctor’s “nefarious network” collapsed.
  • Grant Thornton’s report: Hong Kong Corporate Governance Review 2017.
  • A speech by SFC CEO Ashley Alder discussing governance and regulation.
  • Asian Corporate Governance Association’s 2016 report on Asia-wide governance issues.
  • Bloomberg outlines efforts to improve the quality of small-cap listings.
  • Conclusions from the HKEX consultation on curbing backdoor listings.

--With assistance from Fox Hu and Jeffrey Hernandez.

To contact the reporters on this story: Benjamin Robertson in Hong Kong at brobertson29@bloomberg.net;Jeanette Rodrigues in Mumbai at jrodrigues26@bloomberg.net;Kiuyan Wong in Hong Kong at kwong739@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Sam Mamudi at smamudi@bloomberg.net, ;Candice Zachariahs at czachariahs2@bloomberg.net, Paul Geitner, Grant Clark

©2019 Bloomberg L.P.