Your Guide to Understanding the Trump-Russia Saga
(Bloomberg) -- By now, few American leaders -- other than President Donald Trump, on occasion -- dispute that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. What remains unproven is whether anybody from Trump’s winning campaign assisted in that interference. A wide-ranging criminal investigation has produced indictments against Russian nationals and former Trump advisers, without tying any of the Americans directly to Russia’s influence campaign. Still, there are indications that some people in the Trump campaign may have wanted to play ball.
1. What exactly did Russia do?
U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a campaign to undermine "public faith in the U.S. democratic process" and the candidacy of Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, and that along the way, Putin and his government "developed a clear preference" for Trump. Russia’s efforts included hacking and leaking emails that undermined Clinton’s campaign and using phony accounts and advertising on Facebook and Twitter to sway American public opinion. Putin confirmed he did in fact want Trump to win the election but said that was only because Trump was interested in improving U.S.-Russian relations, and the Russian leader called allegations of meddling "utterly ridiculous." Trump dismisses as a "total hoax" the suggestion that his campaign welcomed Russian interference.
2. What’s still not known?
What if anything Trump or his team did to solicit, encourage or participate in Russia’s effort. This is where Trump has drawn the line, swearing that no evidence will emerge of "collusion," which in legal terms would translate to conspiracy. But Trump’s opponents say some compelling clues are already out in the open.
3. What clues might point to the campaign’s involvement?
Former Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pursued Russia’s help in the campaign, interacted with a suspected Russian agent who promised compromising information about Clinton, and later lied to the FBI. Roger Stone, a longtime Republican operative, dropped hints during the campaign -- backed up by emails made public more recently -- that he knew in advance that information hacked from the Clinton campaign would be released. As Trump was sewing up his party’s nomination in June 2016, a Russian lawyer offering information on Clinton was granted a meeting at Trump Tower with Trump’s eldest son, Donald Jr.; son-in-law, Jared Kushner; and campaign chairman, Paul Manafort. And a Justice Department lawyer told a judge that Manafort may have been a “back channel” between the campaign and Russia.
4. Who’s investigating?
Robert Mueller, a former Federal Bureau of Investigation director, was called back into service as special counsel to oversee the probe. He was appointed in May 2017 by Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, who cited the "unique circumstances" of the case. Eight days before the appointment, Trump had fired the head of the FBI, James Comey, who’d been a key player in the investigation. Appointing Mueller was Rosenstein’s call because his boss at the time, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who was a top Trump adviser during the campaign, recused himself.
5. How did this all begin?
In April 2016, Democratic Party leaders called in a cybersecurity firm to look at suspicious software on their computers. The firm said it found digital footprints of hackers tied to the Russian government. The Democratic National Committee went public with the news and the suspicion of Russian involvement in June, just after Clinton clinched the party’s nomination for president, and just after Julian Assange, editor of the hacktivist website WikiLeaks, said his group had "upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton."
6. What were those leaks?
WikiLeaks released almost 20,000 emails from inside the Democratic National Committee that showed, among other things, how DNC staffers had favored Clinton during her primary campaign against Bernie Sanders -- prompting Debbie Wasserman Schultz to resign as DNC head. Later in the campaign, WikiLeaks released tens of thousands of emails from the Gmail account of John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman. Clinton, looking back on her defeat, said the "WikiLeaks email dumps" had been "like Chinese water torture."
7. And WikiLeaks got those emails from Russia?
That’s the allegation. The report by U.S. intelligence agencies says Russia’s General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate, or GRU, gave the material to WikiLeaks through an intermediary. Some of the emails also were released through the "persona" of a purported Romanian hacker, Guccifer 2.0, and a website, DCLeaks.com, both of which promoted the hacked information to certain journalists. Assange has denied that the Russian government was his source of the hacked emails. But an indictment released by Mueller in July, charging 12 Russian military intelligence officers allegedly assigned to disrupt the U.S. election, said that WikiLeaks asked Guccifer for the hacked emails in order to help promote them in advance of the Democratic National Convention, and that Guccifer responded with instructions on how to access them.
8. Which Trump aides are under scrutiny?
Potentially any who had contact with Russian representatives or intermediaries during the presidential campaign. That list includes Trump Jr., Kushner and Stone, plus:
- Manafort, Trump’s onetime campaign chairman, who was convicted on Aug. 21 of fraud charges relating to actions he took years before he joined the Trump campaign, then pleaded guilty to a separate set of charges and agreed to cooperate with Mueller’s probe, then was accused by prosecutors of lying to them. He earned tens of millions of dollars as a political consultant in Ukraine, advising the pro-Russian Party of Regions, in the years before he went to work for Trump.
- Michael Flynn, who lasted just 24 days as Trump’s first national security adviser. In the words of former acting Attorney General Sally Yates, Flynn "compromised" himself -- made himself vulnerable to being blackmailed -- by lying about the contents of a December 2016 phone call with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak. Flynn pleaded guilty to lying about that call to federal agents and is cooperating with Mueller’s investigation.
- Carter Page, a U.S. energy consultant once listed by Trump as a foreign policy adviser, whose July 2016 visit to Moscow drew the FBI’s interest.
- Michael Cohen, Trump’s onetime personal attorney, who pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about how deeply into his presidential run Trump was pursuing a real-estate project in Moscow. While not speaking directly to possible collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, Cohen’s admission could be used to show Trump had sought to conceal his business interests in Russia. In January 2017, shortly before he took office, Trump wrote on Twitter, "I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA - NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!"
9. Is Trump himself being investigated?
Mueller appears interested in whether Trump obstructed justice by, among other actions, firing Comey as FBI director in May 2017; allegedly asking Comey, days earlier, to go easy on Flynn; allegedly asking Comey for a pledge of loyalty; and (according to the New York Times) attacking Comey and Sessions via Twitter. Then there’s Trump’s personal involvement in the drafting of a misleading statement that tried to spin the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting -- the one that included his son, son-in-law and a Russian lawyer -- as being about international adoptions. In November, Trump’s legal team submitted written answers to questions posed by Mueller’s team.
10. Why is Mueller allowed to look beyond the Russia question?
The Justice Department’s order appointing Mueller instructs him to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign,” as well as -- and this is key -- “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."
11. Does Trump acknowledge Russian meddling in the election?
He’s given mixed signals. He dismissed such reports during the campaign, theorizing that Democrats could just as easily have been hacked by "somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds." In November 2017, he said he believed Putin was sincere in denying Russian meddling in the election. The next day, Trump said he stands with U.S. intelligence agencies on the matter. Appearing with Putin on July 13, Trump again expressed doubt that Russia interfered in the election. In recent Twitter posts he’s called the investigation of collusion a "total disgrace" and an "illegal Joseph McCarthy style Witch Hunt."
The Reference Shelf
- Why Mueller is one contestant Trump can’t easily fire.
- Here are Russia-backed Facebook ads you might have seen in 2016.
- QuickTake explainers on impeachment and obstruction of justice.
- Looking back: People, Politico and the BBC on the biggest revelations from hacked Clinton emails.
- There’s lots of evidence of collusion, Jonathan Chait writes in New York Magazine.
- Collusion isn’t even a crime, say Trump and Rudolph Giuliani.
- A QuickTake explainer on cybercrime and cybersecurity.
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.