ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Wanted Others to Pay More at UN. No One Picked Up the Tab

President Trump wanted other countries to pay more to international organizations at UN, but no one picked up the tab.

Trump Wanted Others to Pay More at UN. No One Picked Up the Tab
Donald Trump and Nikki Haley listen during a panel discussion at the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, U.S. (Photographer: Caitlin Ochs/Bloomberg)

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump’s promise to save American taxpayers money by getting other countries to contribute more to international organizations has been put to the test at the United Nations.

It didn’t go well.

American diplomats in New York lobbied countries including India, Brazil, and Turkey to increase their financial support for the UN’s $6.7 billion-a-year peacekeeping budget, but they came up short during negotiations this month. That will leave the “blue helmets,” who monitor conflict zones from South Sudan to Lebanon, with a $220 million shortfall for the year, as the U.S. refuses to pay more than a quarter of the total budget.

“Unfortunately, in a deeply dissatisfying and disappointing turn of events, every country decided reform was good and right for the UN, but not for how it is financed,” Ambassador Cherith Norman Chalet, the U.S. representative for UN reform, said on Saturday.

The impasse underscores the difficulty the Trump administration faces as it pushes countries to put up more money for international organizations -- from the UN to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization -- where the U.S. has traditionally been the largest donor. The president tweeted on Monday that other countries “take advantage of their friendship with the United States.”

The U.S. remains the top contributor to UN budgets, paying more than $10 billion a year when all expenditures are totaled. It had been paying about 28 percent of the peacekeeping budget, but Congress has capped those payments at 25 percent. The Obama administration, emphasizing the need for multilateral cooperation, waived the cap, but it has been reimposed by the Trump administration, which says many of the peacekeeping efforts are wasteful and ineffective.

Trump Wanted Others to Pay More at UN. No One Picked Up the Tab

As U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley steps down with the arrival of the new year, Trump’s nominee to replace her, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert, is expected to double down on the administration’s criticism of the UN and what it sees as its anti-Israel bias and its inefficiencies.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo signaled a hardening of the approach in a speech this month, saying the UN was founded as “an organization that welcomed peace-loving nations” but that it wasn’t clear if properly serves that mission any more.

UN budget contributions are calculated using a variety of metrics such as a member nation’s population and the size of its economy, but many discounts are granted -- for instance for developing countries with large external debts.

Other UN members argue that the U.S. already got discounts in 2000, when Ambassador Richard Holbrooke negotiated a cut to 22 percent from 25 percent for U.S. payments to the regular UN budget, and a cut to peacekeeping contributions to 27 percent from 30 percent.

“The lack of agreement on a 25 percent ceiling will cause the organization to continue to face a 3 percent shortfall in its peacekeeping budget as the United States will pay no more than 25 percent of peacekeeping expenses, again a less than ideal outcome,” Chalet said.

To contact the reporter on this story: David Wainer in New York at dwainer3@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Bill Faries at wfaries@bloomberg.net, Larry Liebert, John Harney

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.