Judge Blocks Trump's Plan to Undo Obamacare Contraception Rule
The decision is the latest outgrowth of the culture war triggered by Trump’s stated desire to extend “religious freedom” rights.
(Bloomberg) -- A federal judge in Pennsylvania temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s effort to let companies with religious or moral objections to birth control opt out of Obamacare requirements that they offer free contraception in their employee health-care plans.
U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone in Philadelphia issued a nationwide injunction less than 24 hours after the final rules for the exemption, announced in December, were set to take effect. It follows a California judge’s more-limited order late Sunday that blocked the administration’s plan in 13 states and the District of Columbia.
The decision, which may be appealed, is the latest outgrowth of the culture war triggered by Trump’s stated desire to extend “religious freedom” rights from churches to companies -- a move that in 2017 triggered litigation backed by rights groups and Democratic-led states.
A broad injunction is warranted while the case proceeds to trial because the states’ interest in securing the health of women and keeping health-care costs down outweighs any potential harm to the government, the Pennsylvania judge said in her ruling Monday.
"A preliminary injunction is unquestionably in the public interest because it maintains the status quo pending the outcome of this litigation," wrote Beetlestone, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama.
The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro and his New Jersey counterpart, Gurbir Grewal, who challenged exemption rules finalized in December, declared the decision a win for women.
“Women need contraception for their health because contraception is medicine, pure and simple,” Shapiro said in a statement.
The administration’s final rules seek to expand an earlier religious exemption so it applies to for-profit companies, whether private or publicly traded. They also grant a moral-objection exemption to companies "without any need for the objection to be grounded in a religious objection to contraception," according to the ruling.
Companies seeking to use the exemption wouldn’t be required to notify the government because doing so would make them complicit in contraceptives being provided by someone else.
“No American should be forced to violate his or her own conscience in order to abide by the laws and regulations governing our health-care system,” Caitlin Oakley, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, said in an email after the California judge issued the first injunction on Sunday.
Beetlestone said in her 65-page opinion that a nationwide injunction, which Trump has previously condemned as unfair and used too often, is warranted in this case. An order limited to Pennsylvania and New Jersey would have an uneven impact on people who work for companies based in other states or students from out-of-state attending schools in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, she said.
The case is Pennsylvania v. Trump, 2:17-cv-04540, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).
--With assistance from Alyza Sebenius.
To contact the reporter on this story: Erik Larson in New York at elarson4@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Heather Smith at hsmith26@bloomberg.net, David Glovin
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.