Trump Rejected by Supreme Court on California Migrant Sanctuary Law
Trump Rejected by Top Court on California Migrant Sanctuary Law
(Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Trump administration’s immigration policies, letting stand a California sanctuary law that restricts local police from helping federal authorities round up and deport people who are in the country illegally.
The justices left intact a federal appeals court decision that upheld the central part of the 2017 California law. The administration argued in its unsuccessful appeal that the measure undermines deportation efforts, violating federal immigration law and the Constitution.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have granted review.
The California law “makes it more difficult for federal officers to identify, apprehend, detain, and remove aliens under the procedures specified by Congress,” U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued. “The result is that more removable aliens -- often with criminal records -- are released into the community.”
The justices had been deliberating for months over whether to hear the appeal. During that time, President Donald Trump suggested he would use coronavirus relief funds to pressure states into giving up their sanctuary-city policies.
The state law bars local officials from holding an immigrant at the request of federal officials, or telling those authorities when an immigrant is about to be released from jail. It makes exceptions for serious criminal cases and those involving a judicial order.
The clash pitted Trump against a state that has been one of his chief courtroom antagonists. The administration was challenging a decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a court that has drawn the president’s repeated ire.
The justices are already considering Trump’s bid to rescind President Barack Obama’s program of deferred deportation for hundreds of thousands of people who came into the country illegally as children. California is among the states opposing Trump in that case.
In the California case, the 9th Circuit said federal immigration law doesn’t require state authorities to actively assist with deportation efforts. California urged the Supreme Court not to hear the dispute, saying the lower court reached the right decision.
“Nothing in federal law precludes states from defining the circumstances under which state and local officials may use state resources to participate in the enforcement of federal immigration law,” California Attorney General Xavier Becerra argued in court papers.
The case is United States v. California, 19-532.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.