Midterm Campaign Races to an End Before Possible Split in Power
(Bloomberg) -- The most expensive midterm campaign in U.S. history raced to a finish ahead of Tuesday’s election, as both sides braced for a possible split decision that would hand the House to Democrats and leave Republicans holding onto or expanding their Senate majority.
The final hours of campaigning showed familiar themes: President Donald Trump was on the road stumping for Republicans, Democrats were accusing the GOP of fresh efforts at voter suppression, and a hard-edged, Trump-backed ad targeting immigration sparked a debate over whether it was insensitive. NBC and Fox News both said they had pulled the spot.
Partisans were preparing for the unexpected two years after Trump stunned the nation with his surprise win. The president’s sprint to 11 rallies in eight states over six days has him returning to the White House shortly before 2 a.m. Wednesday.
The final deluge of political ads was reduced ever so slightly after Fox News, NBC and Facebook Inc. yanked a controversial spot paid for by the president’s 2020 election campaign about the migrant caravan, after critics described the commercial as racist.
The move is a striking rebuke of a sitting president who late last week tweeted an extended version of the commercial. The ad focuses on the migrant caravan traveling through Mexico, saying it’s filled with “dangerous illegal criminals.” Fox News’ decision to pull the commercial was an unusual break with the president.
“A lot of things are offensive,” Trump told reporters when asked Monday whether he thought the ad was offensive. “They certainly are effective.”
As candidates, surrogates, outside groups and the two parties frantically worked to turn out their voters, strategists for each party agreed the outcome will be determined by the composition of an electorate that’s showing signs of being larger than normal for a midterm year.
The verdict could dramatically alter the second half of Trump’s first term. If they win at least one chamber, Democrats have pledged to stifle the president’s agenda and start investigations into his finances, administration, and Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.
The president’s strategy, which includes heavy emphasis on divisive issues like immigration, risks backfiring on Republican candidates in suburban swing districts that likely will determine control of the House. Yet it may be effective in largely rural states where he remains popular and where many of the closest Senate races are playing out.
Republicans got good economic news Friday in a monthly jobs report that showed non-farm payrolls rose a bigger-than-expected 250,000 in October, and an unemployment rate that held at a 48-year low of 3.7 percent. The report also showed wages, a key metric for many voters, grew 3.1 percent from a year earlier.
“We have a great story to tell,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters Monday. “If people are voting on policy and things like the economy then I think we’re in a really great position.”
Trump readily boasts about the economy, though it hasn’t been the focus of his closing argument to voters. Instead, he’s pushed an unsubstantiated narrative that a dangerous caravan of migrants is about to storm the southern border. It’s part of his bet that immigration, the issue that ignited his presidential campaign, will again mobilize his core supporters.
“There’s no games. Because you look at what’s marching up, that’s an invasion,” Trump said Sunday afternoon in Macon, Georgia. “We’re not letting these people invade our country.”
Democrats entered the final full day of campaigning expressing confidence that they’ll score the net gain of 23 seats needed to take control of the House for the first time since 2010. While Republicans confront serious headwinds in holding the House, the uniqueness of the contest in each of 435 House districts makes for a wide range in the potential number of seats Democrats may gain.
Both sides agree, at least privately, that Republicans are strongly favored to keep control of the Senate, where the electoral map is highly favorable to them. In both Senate and House races, Democrats have focused heavily on health care and protecting people with pre-existing conditions.
A Washington Post-ABC News poll released Sunday showed likely voters prefer Democratic candidates over Republicans for the House, 51 percent to 44 percent. Among registered voters, 44 percent approved of the job Trump is doing as president, while 52 percent disapproved, his best margin in this poll among this group during his presidency.
An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, also made public Sunday, had similar findings on the so-called generic ballot for House races. It showed Democrats leading among women, 55 percent to 37 percent, in a year when a record number of women are running for Congress.
Former President Barack Obama has served as the top headliner for Democratic candidates in recent days. “I’m hopeful that on Tuesday we are going to cut through the lies and the noise and the nonsense and I’m hopeful we are going to remember who we are,” he said at a rally Sunday afternoon in Gary, Indiana.
John Lapp, a strategist who served as executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee when his party won the House in 2006, said strong candidate recruitment and record fundraising are paying dividends in the home stretch.
“The resources have allowed them to tell their story, separate and apart from the national attacks,” he said. “We’re still seeing a map that is much broader than it was in 2006, and so that’s a lot of places for Republicans to defend.”
In the fight for the Senate, Republicans enjoy the advantage of having to defend only nine seats, compared with 26 for the Democrats, to maintain or expand their 51-49 majority.
Polls showed Senate races in Arizona, Nevada, Missouri, Indiana and Florida all within the margin of error, with those in Montana and Texas also tight. The Democratic incumbent most at risk is Senator Heidi Heitkamp, who’s consistently trailed Republican Representative Kevin Cramer in North Dakota, a state Trump won by almost 36 percentage points.
Regardless of the outcome, there’s no doubt that this year’s election has generated an unusually high level of interest among voters. Typically, only about four in 10 eligible voters cast ballots in midterm elections, compared to six in 10 for presidential years.
Buoyed by strong feelings about Trump, pro and con, turnout could hit levels not seen in a half century, said Michael McDonald, a University of Florida professor who runs the United States Elections Project.
McDonald estimates that 45 percent of Americans eligible to vote will cast ballots, with a wide range possible. Turnout had been declining in midterms from a high of 48.7 percent in 1966, following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and battles over civil rights, McDonald said. It reached an 84-year low in 2014, at 36.7 percent.
The elections project reported Monday afternoon that 35.6 million people had cast ballots already, 42.8 percent of the 83.1 million counted in the 2014 midterm. Advance ballots totaled 27.2 million that year and McDonald expects about 40 million mail and in-person early votes this year. Early voting has already exceeded levels from 2014, with some states seeing levels more common in presidential years.
“The only explanation has to be Donald Trump,” McDonald said. “He’s inflamed passions both for and against him.’’
David Winston, a Republican strategist who worked for former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and advises Republican leadership in Congress, said he sees a volatile electorate and estimates about a quarter of independents -- a majority of whom have a negative view of both political parties -- are still undecided.
Traditionally, at least in wave elections, independents have decisively broken one way or another: Republicans won independents by 14 percentage points in 1994 when they captured a net 52 seats in the House, and lost independents by 18 percentage points in 2006 when Democrats won 31 seats, Winston said.
While Trump has been focusing on immigration, the economy and whether voters feel they’ve recovered from the Great Recession is likely to have more impact on the outcome, Winston said.
“If they feel like they’re breaking out of that cycle, then that’s a reasonable environment for Republicans,” he said. “If, however, they don’t, then they’re just going to be willing to rock the boat again.’’
John Brabender, a Republican strategist who served as a senior adviser to former Pennsylvania senator and 2016 presidential candidate Rick Santorum, said he’ll be looking for signs of how the election is unfolding by watching the results in rural, blue-collar areas and moderate, Republican-leaning districts. Those include Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District in suburban Philadelphia, where Republican Representative Brian Fitzpatrick is seeking re-election in a district Hillary Clinton won in 2016.
Much of the national focus has been on the fight for Congress, but 36 states will also elect governors on Tuesday, including high-profile contests in Florida and Georgia. Democrats have decent prospects to capture governorships in Rust Belt and Midwest states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa that were key to Trump’s 2016 victory.
Boosted by grassroots enthusiasm, the Democratic Party of Wisconsin is spending twice as much as it ever has in a midterm to spur turnout and promote its message, said Martha Laning, the state party chair.
Governor Scott Walker, a Republican who’s won three statewide elections including a recall race and ran for president in 2016, was tied at 47 percent with Democrat Tony Evers in a Marquette Law School Poll released last week.
“I think people are ready for a change,” Laning said.
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.