Manafort Jury Completes Third Day of Deliberations: Trial Update
Jurors will return to court Tuesday morning after weighing the evidence for more than eight hours.
(Bloomberg) -- Jurors in the Paul Manafort trial ended their third day of deliberations Monday without reaching a verdict on 18 counts of bank and tax fraud against President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman.
Jurors Reach No Verdict After Extended Talks (6:30 p.m.)
Jurors will return to court Tuesday morning after weighing the evidence for more than eight hours. They deliberated until the judge dismissed them at 6:15 p.m. after they extended their day by about an hour.
Jurors had no notes on Monday and give no indication of how close they are to a verdict. After court, Manafort’s lawyer, Kevin Downing, said the defense was encouraged.
Deliberations resume at 9:30 a.m. in Alexandria, Virginia.
Lawyers Huddle With Judge (11:25 a.m.)
U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III conferred with lawyers twice Monday morning at sidebar conferences away from the public. It’s not clear what was discussed.
Manafort sat at the defense table during both discussions.
Before the first sidebar Ellis told lawyers: “We do not have a question at this time. If you need to communicate anything with me, you may come to the bench.” Earlier, the judge spoke with the lawyers, right after he had welcomed the jurors. A court security officer was present at both sidebar.
The judge had said he would make transcripts of the sidebars public after the trial, with the exception of the jurors’ names and any discussions that would involve Mueller’s investigation of the Trump campaign.
‘Peace and Safety’ of the Jurors (10:21 a.m.)
Upon welcoming the jurors, Ellis noted the absence of Greg Andres, the lead prosecutor for Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and said he hoped he wasn’t ill. Assistant U.S. Attorney Uzo Asonye said Andres indeed was fine, but didn’t say why he wasn’t in court. On Friday, Ellis revealed he had received threats and was concerned for the “peace and safety’’ of the jurors after the high-profile case concludes. As a result, he rejected a request from a media coalition to release the jurors’ names after the verdict.
“I’ve received criticism and threats,’’ Ellis said Friday as jurors deliberated. “I can imagine they would, too. If you told jurors at the advance of this trial that their names would be public or at the outset of this trial that their names would be public, I might see some requests to be excused.”
Read more: A look at some of the key disputed issues
He said he was surprised by the public attention the trial has garnered.
“I had no idea that this case would excite these emotions,’’ Ellis said. “I mean, it’s obvious to the people who were here at the beginning that I did not understand how this case would be perceived by members of the public and the press.”
The judge also said that he wouldn’t describe the threats he’s received, but he’s under the protection of the U.S. marshals.
To contact the reporters on this story: David Voreacos in federal court in Newark, New Jersey, at dvoreacos@bloomberg.net;Andrew Harris in Washington at aharris16@bloomberg.net;Neil Weinberg in New York at nweinberg2@bloomberg.net;Daniel Flatley in Washington at dflatley1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jeffrey D Grocott at jgrocott2@bloomberg.net, Joe Schneider
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.