Memo Leaves Trump With Little New Ammunition Against Mueller

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump was eager to have a Republican memo alleging bias in the Russia probe released to the public, several people around him said.

Now that it’s out, Trump took to Twitter to promote it for that purpose -- although the document may not be as effective as the president wants it to be.

It didn’t, for one thing, touch on the work of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and didn’t give Trump much pretext to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who’s overseeing the inquiry into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign. One top Republican, Representative Trey Gowdy, said Saturday that “there’s going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier.”

Still, Trump tweeted from his Florida resort Saturday morning that “this memo totally vindicates ‘Trump’ in probe,” his first public comment since the memo’s release.

Trump added that “the Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on. Their (sic) was no Collusion and there was no Obstruction (the word now used because, after one year of looking endlessly and finding NOTHING, collusion is dead). This is an American disgrace!”

Memo Leaves Trump With Little New Ammunition Against Mueller

Low-Level Adviser

The partisan memo by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee alleges FBI and Justice Department officials involved in the probe into Trump and Russia in 2016 failed to tell a secret court that a dossier they cited to get a surveillance warrant on a low-level Trump adviser was paid for by Democrats.

While Democrats slammed the findings as inaccurate and misleading, including in a six-page point-by-point rebuttal released on Saturday, the memo was enough for some Republican partisans to call for shutting down the entire investigation into Russian interference in the campaign and whether anyone close to Trump colluded in it. “Should be game over,” Donald Trump Jr. tweeted.

Several prominent Republicans, however, sent the White House clear signals they wouldn’t back any effort to use the memo as grounds to disrupt Mueller’s work or get rid of Rosenstein.

Justice Obstructed?

House Speaker Paul Ryan, who facilitated the memo’s release, said Friday it should be viewed narrowly and not used “to impugn the integrity of the justice system and FBI.”

That’s also the tack taken by House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy, who’s also the only Republican on the House Intelligence Committee who’s seen the classified intelligence used to write the memo.

“There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower,” Gowdy said in an interview with CBS News that will air Sunday on “Face the Nation.”

The dossier “also doesn’t have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there’s going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier,” Gowdy said, according to a partial transcript provided by the network.

Four Associates

Mueller’s investigation has already ensnared four Trump associates, with indictments against former campaign manager Paul Manafort and his deputy Rick Gates, and guilty pleas from campaign adviser George Papadopoulos and former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Trump still has plenty of allies goading him to take drastic steps to curtail or end Mueller’s probe. Republican Representative Paul Gosar of Arizona said Rosenstein and others were “traitors” for signing applications for surveillance warrants against Carter Page, the former Trump adviser, and said he would send a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions urging their prosecution.

The memo made two glancing references to Rosenstein, noting that he signed at least one extension of the surveillance application. But it didn’t mention Mueller and concerned only limited portions of the broad probe by the Federal Bureau of Investigation into Russian interference.

‘Cherry-Picked’ Testimony

It also said that then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence panel that the bureau would never have sought a surveillance warrant on Page without the information from the dossier, which was gathered by former British spy Christopher Steele on behalf of Fusion GPS, an investigative firm.

But Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the Intelligence panel, said McCabe’s testimony was “cherry-picked,” omitting what he said about the origins of the probe, which didn’t involve the dossier.

Schiff, who is working to get a competing Democratic memo released to the public, also disputed the memo’s key finding about the FBI not informing the foreign surveillance court that Trump rival Hillary Clinton and the Democrats paid for the Steele dossier.

‘Political Effort’

The California lawmaker made clear in a call with reporters Friday that the court was informed about Steele’s political motivations. While Republicans said Clinton wasn’t named, Schiff said that’s because U.S. officials try to limit references to U.S. citizens in foreign surveillance applications.

If anything, the memo inadvertently makes clear that the FBI was probing possible contacts between Trump associates and Russians before it started looking into Page. The document notes that the bureau started investigating Papadopoulos in July 2016, three months before it sought the first surveillance warrant on Page.

Denying that Trump intended to interfere with the Russia probe, White House spokesman Raj Shah told CNN Friday night,“No changes are going to be made at the DOJ. We fully expect Rosenstein to continue on.” But some Democrats and others said they fear otherwise.

‘Talk is Cheap’

“This is a political effort to discredit the FBI and ultimately to discredit anything touching on Mueller’s Russia investigation,” said Ronald Hosko, former assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division and now president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund.

“This is to create doubt about the FBI and erode Mueller’s investigation and bring it to a premature conclusion. Period,” Hosko said.

Hosko said he talked with some FBI officials before the memo was made public and got the impression that Director Christopher Wray didn’t want to get into a public battle over the memo. Instead, Wray wants to move forward and have the bureau focus on its work, Hosko said.

Hours after the memo was released, Wray issued a statement to the bureau’s workforce, saying, “Talk is cheap; the work you do is what will endure. We speak through our work. One case at a time.”

It’s unclear whether the memo’s release will affect Trump’s relationship with Mueller and his investigation.

Little Resistance

So far, Trump’s legal team has been working with Mueller in hopes of getting the probe resolved as quickly as possible. They have put up little resistance to handing over documents or arranging interviews with White House staff. The lawyers are currently discussing the terms of an interview between Trump and Mueller and one could take place in the coming weeks, said a person familiar with the process.

But the investigation isn’t wrapping up as quickly as Trump’s lawyers would like. White House lawyer Ty Cobb had been saying since August that he expected it to be complete by the end of 2017, but there’s still no clear end in sight. The lawyers could grow impatient with Mueller’s probe if it drags on past an interview with Trump, said a person familiar with the matter.

Mueller has additional interviews scheduled this month with the former spokesman for Trump’s legal team, Mark Corallo, said a person familiar with the matter. Mueller is expected to ask Corallo about the drafting of a statement for Trump Jr. regarding a meeting he had with a Russian lawyer promising dirt on Clinton during the campaign. Mueller has also indicated he would like to interview former White House strategist Steve Bannon, though a date hasn’t been set.

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.