Ayodhya Case: Questions Asked Only To Us, Not To Hindu Side, Muslim Parties Allege In Supreme Court
A mural depicting Hindu gods Rama, left, and Sita is displayed on a wall in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India. (Photographer: Prashanth Vishwanathan/Bloomberg)

Ayodhya Case: Questions Asked Only To Us, Not To Hindu Side, Muslim Parties Allege In Supreme Court

Bookmark

Muslim parties alleged before the Supreme Court on Monday that questions are asked only from them and not posed to the Hindu side in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi land dispute case at Ayodhya.

This comment was made by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the Muslim parties, before a five -judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

"Your Lordship didn't ask question to the other side. All the questions have been asked to us only. Of course, we are answering them," Dhavan told the bench on the 38th day of the crucial hearing in the case.

The submission was vehemently opposed by senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan, representing deity 'Ram Lalla', who said, "this is totally unwarranted".

Also read: Mexico’s AMLO Tells Ratings Firms to Be ‘More Objective’

Dhavan's remark came when the bench, which also comprises justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, said that the idea behind erecting iron railing at the disputed site was to separate the inner courtyard from the outer courtyard.

By putting up an iron railing, the idea was to separate Hindus and Muslims and it was to appreciate the fact that Hindus were offering prayers in the outer-courtyard where 'Ram Chabutra', 'Sita Rasoi', 'Bhandar Grih' were situated, the court said.

The bench also took note of Dhavan's submissions that the Hindus only had "prescriptive right" to enter and offer prayer at the site and it does not mean that they had ownership claim over the disputed property.

Also read: Ayodhya Case: Idols Surreptitiously Put Inside Babri Masjid In 1949, Muslim Parties Tell Supreme Court

As you say they had the right to pray and enter, does it not dilute your right to ownership, the bench asked, adding in case of "exclusive ownership" over a property, can a third person be allowed entry and prayer right.

The protracted hearing in the case has entered the crucial final leg on Monday as the top court resumed proceedings on the 38th day after the week-long Dussehra break.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Also read: Ayodhya Case: Supreme Court Says Examining Babur’s Dedication Of Mosque ‘Little Problematic’

BQ Install

Bloomberg Quint

Add BloombergQuint App to Home screen.