ADVERTISEMENT

After Statistical Commission’s Members Quit, Government Tries Damage Control

The government said the members who resigned from National Statistical Commission never raised concerns at the panel’s meetings.

Indian national flags fly outside the North Block of the Central Secretariat buildings in New Delhi, India. (Photographer: Anindito Mukherjee/Bloomberg)
Indian national flags fly outside the North Block of the Central Secretariat buildings in New Delhi, India. (Photographer: Anindito Mukherjee/Bloomberg)

India tried to allay concerns about its jobs data two days after external members of the National Statistical Commission quit citing differences with the government.

The commission’s acting chairman PC Mohanan and member JV Meenakshi, a professor at Delhi School of Economics, cited withholding the National Sample Survey Office’s report on employment for 2017-18—which was vetted by the commission—among the reasons for their resignations, the Business Standard newspaper reported. “The report was approved and should have been released immediately, but wasn’t," Mohanan told the newspaper. The committee now only has Chief Statistician Pravin Srivastava and NITI Aayog Chief Executive Officer Amitabh Kant as members.

Opinion
Resignations At Statistical Commission Disturbing, Says Former Minister YK Alagh

The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation said in a statement today it “not only places a high regard for the commission but also values its advice and on which appropriate action is taken”. It said the labour force survey conducted by the Periodic Labour Force Survey, launched in April 2017, has been designed to yield annual estimates of labour force on employment and unemployment along with quarterly estimates for urban areas. “NSSO is processing the quarterly data for the period July 2017 to December 2018 and the report will be released thereafter,” the statement said.

This comes after the government last year released official estimates for the back-data of the new GDP series which showed high growth during the NDA governments, which was significantly different from findings of a panel constituted by the committee, released earlier. The committee’s members cited the government’s lack of consultation before releasing the backdated GDP series as a key reason for their resignation.

Opinion
Is The New GDP Series In Sync With Other Economic Indicators?

The statement also said the committee was consulted before the release of back series data and “had itself urged the ministry to finalise and release it”. The official estimates of the back series of GDP were accordingly computed using the methodology adopted with 2011-12 as the base year and this was approved by the experts in the Advisory Committee on National Accounts Statistics, and later discussed in the committee, according to the statement.

The government said that keeping in view India’s strong demographic dividend and around 93 percent of the informal workforce, “it is important to improve measures of employment through administrative statistics and complemented by periodic surveys”.

The ministry said it has started releasing estimates of new members enrolling in large social security schemes like the Employees’ Provident Fund, Employees’ State Insurance Scheme and the National Pension Scheme, adding that this is a good measure about the workforce moving towards formalisation.

Opinion
The GDP Debate: Does The Old Series And New Series Data Match Up?