U.K.’s Covid Contract to Cummings’ Friends Was Unlawful

The U.K. government was dealt an embarrassing setback after a judge found it unlawfully awarded a 564,000 pound ($800,000) coronavirus contract to a research firm whose owners were friends of Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s former chief adviser.

The U.K.’s handing of the award to Public First during the pandemic “gave rise to apparent bias and was unlawful,” the High Court judge ruled Wednesday. The firm’s owners were alleged to have close connections with both the prime minister’s ex-aide Dominic Cummings and lawmaker Michael Gove.

The government is currently challenging a number of lawsuits brought by public-interest group Good Law Project accusing it of cronyism over how lucrative contracts were handed out during the pandemic. It’s the latest ruling over procurement that the government has lost. In February, another London judge ruled that Health Minister Matt Hancock failed to properly disclose details of coronavirus-related contracts.

The U.K. has suffered one of the worst death tolls from coronavirus in the world. A public inquiry next year will address criticisms that Johnson waited too long to impose lockdowns, failed to protect care homes in the early stages, and did not ensure sufficient stocks of protective equipment for health workers. The outcome of the probe and the lawsuits pose significant political risks to the premier.

U.K.’s Covid Contract to Cummings’ Friends Was Unlawful

Cummings, who stepped down as Johnson’s highest-profile aide last year, has been publicly critical of the government’s handling of the crisis. Last month, he said Johnson was “unfit” to be prime minister and accused him of saying he’d rather see “bodies pile high” than order a third national lockdown. He also accused Hancock of lying. Both Johnson and Hancock have rejected the allegations.

Judge Finola O’Farrell dismissed two other claims against the government, including that there were problems with the pace or scale of the contract.

“The existence of personal connections between Gove, Mr. Cummings and the directors of Public First was a relevant circumstance that might be perceived to compromise their impartiality and independence in the context of a public procurement,” she said in her ruling.

The contract appeared to show “there was a real possibility, or a real danger, that the decision-maker was biased,” O’Farrell said.

Cummings posted on Twitter to criticize the ruling.

Ill-equipped

In a February hearing for the suit Cummings said in a witness statement the health department was ill-equipped to communicate with citizens when the virus started spreading rapidly over a year ago.

“They did not have the people or skills needed to undertake this type of public communications at speed,” he said in the statement made public as part of the case. “Some of the first drafts of mass communication material were confusing and confusion clearly could have deadly consequences.”

Neil Swift, a lawyer at Peters & Peters, who wasn’t involved in the case said the U.K. must finally take action to control the risk of public corruption.

“The court made clear that they were not concerned with the suggestion of actual bias, but rather with the appearance of bias” but if “a public decision maker breached an expectation to act without bias and subsequently received a reward for doing so” they run the risk of committing a bribery offense, he said.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said that judge recognized the complex circumstances at the height of the pandemic and that failure to provide effective communications would have put public health at risk.

A further hearing will work out how much in legal costs the government will have to pay, as well as whether it’s allowed to appeal the decision. It’s also awaiting another ruling concerning the lawfulness of its awarding of personal-protective equipment contracts during the crisis.

A spokesman for Public First said the judge made no criticism of the company. It accepted that “the judge found that weak internal processes gave rise to the appearance of bias.”

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

BQ Install

Bloomberg Quint

Add BloombergQuint App to Home screen.