Science Confirms Hurricane Harvey Was Indeed ‘Biblical’
(Bloomberg) -- When Hurricane Harvey dropped 60 inches of rain on Houston in August, some described the storm as “biblical.” One of America’s leading hurricane scientists has now sharpened that assessment.
“By the standards of the average climate during 1981-2000,” MIT’s Kerry Emanuel writes in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, “Harvey’s rainfall in Houston was ‘biblical’ in the sense that it likely occurred around once since the Old Testament was written.”
Emanuel’s analysis attempts to answer a series of questions critical to recovery and rebuilding in Houston and elsewhere: “Should buildings, homes, roads, and associated infrastructure be built in the same place again?” he wrote. Are building codes, levees and sea walls tough enough for the future? As the world warms, every community will have to grapple with these questions on their own.
Climate scientists continue to project that as the century goes on, hotter seas and more humid air are likely to make tropical storms more intense. The first volume of the latest U.S. National Climate Assessment, released by the Trump administration earlier this month, reports scientists having higher confidence in their finding that storms will carry more precipitation. Global warming has already helped increase the annual likelihood of Harvey-like rainfall sixfold since the end of the 20th century, to about 6 percent, Emanuel writes. Before this century’s out, that probability may rise to 18 percent.
Researchers such as Emanuel are working with hurricane records that are historically short and incomplete. The best data have come since 1980, and while scientists have greater confidence in their projections going forward, the historical record is still very noisy. Information can be gleaned by combining observations with well-understood meteorological physics and with powerful computer models that can simulate past trends and “run” thousands of future storms.
“It’s a ground-breaking paper,” said Adam Sobel, an earth and environmental sciences professor at Columbia University. He said that Emanuel’s work may be the first to deploy an approach that comprehensively analyzes the changing probability of a storm hitting over time. The report’s conclusion is “stunning” and consistent with Houston’s recent spate of floods, but raises more questions than it answers, Sobel said. For instance, Emanuel was unable to determine why Hurricane Harvey stalled over Houston.
There are no facts about the future, the saying goes. Until there are, physics models tuned with historical data are the next best thing.
©2017 Bloomberg L.P.