Value Vs Growth: Here’s What These Portfolio Managers Think

India’s equity benchmarks rose to new records in the last 12 months on the back of heavyweights even as the broader markets struggled. As investors piled into a few safe bets, valuations surged. The polarisation has even forced veterans like Raamdeo Agrawal to reconsider their strategy as it’s difficult to find value picks.Where do portfolio managers stand on the growth versus value debate?BloombergQuint spoke with Anshul Saigal of Kotak Portfolio Management Services; Samit Vartak of Sage One Investment Advisors; Vikas Khemani of Carnelian Capital Advisors; and Varun Goel of Nippon India Asset Management Company; at this year’s edition of PMS AIF World Summit in Mumbai.Samit VartakValue investing is where investors rely on the rerating of companies, said Varthak, adding that one has to accurately predict bullish economic cycles to enter the market.“If we enter a bullish economic cycle, the value companies which are the cheap price earning multiples, double or triple in terms of valuation itself,” he said. “We’re at a point where the probability of that cycle occurring over the next two to three years is high.”Anshul SaigalValue investing isn’t buying stocks at lower price-to-earnings multiples but scouting for those scrips that haven’t priced in future growth potential, according to Saighal. “There are so many quality large businesses and leaders in their space, where there has been a spell of derating over the last two years,” he said. “And that derating is not commensurate with their earnings power or their ability to grow their businesses.”Vikas KhemaniInvesting is about making a hypothesis and assigning a probability to it and one can make a lot of money if they get both the factors spot on, Khemani said, adding economic recovery will be “across the spectrum”. Investors, he said, need to make a hypothesis in the industry they understand. “I think we believe that growth investing is what wins over a long period of time but I must caveat that it also depends on the psychology, style and understanding of the investor.”Varun GoelScouting for stocks with earnings growth potential is the preferred investment strategy, Goel said. “In the last 20 years, if you see in the equity markets, the only sustainable wealth creation has come from sustainable compounding of earnings growth and high quality of corporate governance.”.Top ThemesThe fund managers said that the two broader themes that could dominate investing decisions over the medium-term were real estate and sectors directly affected by the formalisation of the economy.Khemani pointed out the real-estate’s 10-year cycle has kicked off where one can find 15-25 multi-baggers if not more. Varthak agreed, saying that the government’s move to cut corporate taxes may kick-start an investment cycle and generate jobs.“The gestation period for someone to come into that industry has to be very long, so you can’t bet on generic building materials, but you will have to look at specialised building materials,” Vartak said. “It could be some structural engineering side or in the electrical cable side, but those are going to be in high demand.”Goel said formalisation of the economy through goods and services tax and other digitisation efforts would benefit the market leaders. “Now who are the guys who are going to benefit? The number one, two three players in each sector are expected to gain market share.”.Watch the full discussion here.Edited excerpts from the conversation:.Vikas, I want to start off with you, what’s your sense of what will win going ahead for the next 11 months, arguably for the next 23 months? Would it be value or return of value? Or do you believe growth which has largely stayed on course for the better part of 2019 will continue doing that?Vikas Khemani: I think the way we look at India, it is a growth market. Not now buy I think historically whether you look at the last 10-20 years. India is a very young country and we have a huge amount of growth which is there. So, I believe that given our setup, India will continue to grow, and growth investing will sort of do very well. Having said that, it is also very important to understand that investing outcome is also dependent on the person or investor. I mean, if a growth investor starts looking for value, value investors start looking for growth, it will get sort of confusing and have a different outcome. We as a firm, firmly believe that growth investing is what works. We understand how to look at growth investing. Of course, in recent past, depending on the market cycle, growth at any price is in vogue and probably that might come into question. So, the way we look at as a firm is growth at a reasonable price. Now, what is reasonable is a question and one can keep on debating about it. That is where the lines are blurred and we’ll have to keep looking at it.But we believe that over the next 5-7 years as India goes towards $5 trillion economy, you will see ample amount of growth ahead of it. Previously, there was a talk about volatility. The analogy I give is let’s say to take a period of 2001- to now. If I remember distinctly, 2002 Nifty was 800 approximate points. Now, today, we’re at 12,000. In 17 or 18-year period. In this period, imagine what all has not happened from a volatility perspective- UPA 1, UPA 2, Global Financial crisis, coal scam, 2G scam, demonetisation, GST, Brexit, geopolitical situations. All kinds of possible global and local six-sigma events also have taken place despite that India’s GDP has gone up. Returns have been 16-17 percent compounded growth. So, I think we believe that growth investing is what wins over a long period of time but I must caveat that it also depends on the psychology, style and understanding of the investor. Then, in every market, every strategy can win..The question is, as because said growth at reasonable price, or growth at any price and 2019 for a large part saw growth at any price win over growth was at a reasonable price. Do you think that will reverse over the course of the next seven months?Varun Goel: No, our sense is very clear that there are hundreds of ways of making money in the market and we all need to figure out what works best for us. As far as we know, as a fund house are concerned, we are very clear that for us, the way to make money is growth with quality. So, in our sense and in our word, there is no compromise with quality..Our sense is, the last 20 years if you see in the equity markets, the only sustainable wealth creation that we have seen, has come from sustainable compounding of earnings growth. That happens when a company delivers growth along with a high return on equity- which is more than the cost of capital.Varun Goel, manager, Nippon India AMC.So, let’s take an example. So, we had a lot of financial institutions and banks which are under trouble today. They had a a lot of growth. They also had high ROE but there were concerns on corporate governance and 10-20 years down the line, the value has been destroyed.So sustainable wealth creation can happen if you have a high quality of corporate governance, you have a good clean board, you have a good earnings growth, which can sustain over 5-20 years. So, in our view, while quality can underperform for three-six months, maybe even a year but we believe that investing in quality companies is the way to create sustainable wealth.Let’s take the example of some of the names that are quite expensive. There is no denying the fact that some names on the consumer side, banking side are quite expensive if you look at conventional valuation parameters. But if you see the sustainability of growth, I think that’s where a lot of times mispricing happens. How do you value sustainability and what we do in our models is try and figure out whether the earnings growth that the company is undergoing today can sustain over a very long period of time. That is a function of the sector and some strong tailwinds that the company or the sector might be undergoing.So as long as there is a runway for growth, which is beyond the normal growth level of the economy, we believe companies can stay expensive on valuation parameters for a fairly long period of time. Considering India’s macroeconomic parameters today, with around 5 to 6 percent economic growth, we are looking at nominal earnings growth of 8 to 10 percent. So, we are clearly in an environment where growth is very scarce. Therefore, any company which gives you double-digit growth is going to be expensive..A lot of people would say cite the example of say an HUL in the previous decade wherein it was not as if it were not growing, but there was a time correction, if not a price correction, and people who were not invested. So how do you position your portfolio right now, when we’ve already seen a year or two years of quality really outperforming and becoming very expensive?Samit Vartak: So, everyone defines value differently. For me, value investing is where you more rely on the re-rating of the company. But you can find value with expensive stocks- seemingly expensive stocks where growth is high that everyone talks about. So, think in a tough economy, it’s very difficult to get re-rating. Value investing doesn’t work and that’s what’s happened over the last 5-7 years. In a tough economy, more and more investors migrate towards the quality companies. In quality companies, if you also have reliable growth, even if it’s lower level of growth in it may not be 15-30 percent kind of growth but even if it’s double digit kind of growth, people tend to give more and more value to that. So, the re-rating definitely happens, but it happens only in a select sector and it just happened, not just in India, but across the world, people are migrated. So, I think question is whether value investing versus growth investing would work is whether we are entering into a bullish economic cycle or not.If we enter into a bullish economic cycle, generally, the value companies, which are the cheap price-earnings multiples, double or triple in terms of valuation itself. So, if you get that cycle right. In value investing, getting the cycle right is very important. Unfortunately, not many people have the ability to predict that cycle right. Because, many people thought that 2014 was the start of that kind of a cycle, but actually didn’t work out the way everyone thought. Every point in time, you may feel that the cycle is starting. Sometimes you’ll get it right. I believe that today we are at a point where the probability of that cycle occurring over the next two to three years is high. That’s where I think value investing with some growth can definitely outperform and that’s what I tried to showcase in that in my memo is that- if the growth comes through, and if you’re buying at a really cheap value. The average P/E multiple then in 2011, when I looked at that it was 13 times and that 13 times became or 35 times on an average because the growth came through those companies and this was in a tough cycle. In a really good cycle, that re-rating can be even significantly higher than that. So that’s where value investing can make you tons of money if you get the cycle right.If you’re investing in the high-quality companies where you’re paying 60-80 times multiple, the returns from re-rating is almost impossible. It’s very difficult. So, you will probably make the earnings growth, which is probably in the low teens, which is the returns that you would expect from..So, you are positioning your portfolios for the uptick in growth coming in the value names?Vartak: Absolutely, but the philosophy that I follow is that I look for 20 percent growth. I’ll definitely look for growth but again, I for me, the re-rating of valuation multiple trigger has to be there. For that reason, I will never pay something like a 60-80 times kind of multiple. I’m fine paying 25-35 times if the growth is commensurate to that..Anshul, how are you positioning your portfolios for gains for the next 12 to 24 months?Anshul Saigal: Taking on from what Samit said, we believe that value is not just about buying cheap. It’s not about buying four- six times P/E value, maybe they’re in companies which are trading 25 times P/E but when growth is not priced in that even at 25 times P/E, the market believes that the growth in this company is going to be 15 percent, but in our judgment, it’s going to be 25 percent. When that growth comes in, even 25 times P/E can get rerated. In that context, we are in the camp that value is finding growth that is not priced in. We do believe that with the correction that has happened over the last two years in the broader markets, that stage is where we are at today, where you have so many companies, quality large businesses, leaders in their space, where there has been bout of derating which has played out over the last two years. That derating is not commensurate with their earnings power or their ability to grow their businesses. As that earning power or their ability to grow their businesses comes to the fore, there is a high likelihood that we will see a rerating pattern play out in these companies.So, we are firmly in the camp that this is a time for value. Now, of course, as I said value is something that each one defines on his own. In our judgment, value is not as I mentioned earlier, buying cheap only but value is buying growth, which is not priced in. I can give you instances from the past you could have bought very expensive companies in the environment that they were in at that time, like the largest biscuit manufacturer. At one time, it had a 6 percent Ebitda margin, trading at 25 times P/E while the market was trading at anywhere from 12- 13 times. You could have well said that this is a very expensive name. But what you will not pricing in is that this 6 percent Ebitda margin is going to move to 10-13 percent over the next three to four years. So, that 25 times P/E is really not expensive at this time, it is in fact cheap versus what the earning power of this company is which is not priced in. In that context, we do believe that again taking from what Samit mentioned, that it is important to get the cycle right. In the last two years, we played out the down cycle, maybe some more of that is in the works, but largely that cycle is behind us.. This is a time in our judgment for that cycle to turn. If you get the quality right, if you got if you get the business right, it can be quite remunerative over the next few years..Vikas, if you’re trying to do that? Are you trying to in effect also trying to time the market a little bit because consensus view is that nominal GDP growth at best is about 10 to 12 percent. So, when you are building your current portfolio, when you’re getting the fresh money and putting in current money to work, what are you doing?Goel: First of all, we believe that we are coming out of a long period of consolidation, a painful period. GDP has gone down. A lot of businesses have kind of suffered IL&FS crisis made the situation worse. So investing is about making a hypothesis and assigning a probability to it. If your probability and hypothesis is true, then you should be making a lot of money. We believe that this economic cycle stage as Samit was also saying that- I think the probability of a reasonably higher growth ahead of us over the next four-five years is very high across the spectrum. I believe that this recovery would be fairly wide, it won’t be focused on a particular sector only. I think you will see a reasonably widespread recovery across sectors. I think that is a setup and pretty much everything will make money, but you have to obviously choose your winner you have to do that. So, you have to make a hypothesis industry which you understand..I believe that this recovery would be fairly wide, it won’t be focused on a particular sector only. I think you will see a reasonably widespread recovery across sectors. I think that is a setup and pretty much everything will make money, but you have to obviously choose your winner you have to do that. So, you have to make a hypothesis industry which you understand.Vikas Khemani, Founder, Carnelian Capital Advisors.More importantly, the way we look at it, we have in our portfolio what we call a magic pocket or a magic basket where we typically look at companies where we can get not only earnings growth but also valuations re-rating. That is where you kind of make a lot of money. In that typically, there are many setups. Once a while, you stumble upon an idea where you can say this company will get re-rated, but you create a framework of situations when you find value and you find re-rating.So, we have created a framework where we think you get ideas from there. So, one such example. You are good business but something is broken. So, let us say either the management level. There are a lot of good businesses but something is broken- the CEO or at the management level and a change in that management or CEO happens. That usually follows by a reasonably good amount of growth and re-rating.Take ICICI bank as an example banking is a great business. One bank did in a particular way, the second bank did it in a particular way. Change of CEO, change of management happened. You see what kind of ratings in place and it probably can still deliver.Reliance Nippon we’re seeing, once the change of management happened, it was the same business doing very well. Exactly same business, you noticed nothing changed, just a change in the management. You know it has delivered. So, these kinds of situations in the market keeps on occurring.Good business cycle change happens and business strategy change happens, companies go through a huge amount of capex, opex cycle, when that is about to get over you see it is usually followed by a huge amount of growth as well as the valuation re-rating.There are very new standard situations which are available in the market, you can define them, you can create a framework around that, and you can generate consistent ideas around that. So, the way we feel that right now with that market is so well placed on a probability perspective, that you are staring at a change in the economic cycle and a lot of businesses you can figure out which businesses are going to fall into this re-rating and super-growth category..I’ll tell you the problem with that though. Maybe some of these undervalued companies could make a comeback. If I have limited capital, the conundrum is do I get out of some of those performing stocks because they are expensive, but the market still favours them, and try and park the money in something that is cheap. The question always comes why fix something that ain’t broken?Vartak: So, I think it’s important to first be clear about what are the return expectations. If you are betting on high-quality companies where what kind of earnings growth you’re going to get and you know that there is not going to be rerating of valuations. If you’re fine with that low teens kind of returns, then there’s no reason for you to switch. If your expectations are high, and if you are expecting to make more than 20 percent, kind of return and I think that’s where you need to think about those, that’s where you, obviously you need to take a little more risk,. Nothing is free in this world. So, as Vikas said, you need to make a hypothesis of what would be the next theme. It may not be that the entire portfolio needs to be betting on the new upcoming themes but at least some portion of that your portfolio has to be there because if you get it right, and if the valuation is in your favour, those companies can go up not just 10 times in 10 years, but you can go up to 30 timesin 10 years.Those are the bets an investor who wants to make higher returns than the usual earnings growth kind of returns have to make and it’s an individual call..Varun, with a bit of presumption that you are a bit of an outlier here compared to the others. What’s happening is that the number one company is taking the lion’s share, the number two is probably taking a little bit, and then the others are falling by the wayside. A number here and a number there. So therefore, would you wait as some people do or do the opposite?Goel: So, no, I think just to elaborate on the point that you said. India is in the midst of unprecedented transformation. As we speak, India’s economy is only 50 percent organised. To draw a comparison, United States is 90 percent organised- which means 90 percent of the products and services that the consumers there purchase, are coming from the organised sector.Now, what we have done in the last 3-5 years is with this digitisation, Aadhaar, Goods and Services Tax and demonetisation. We are breaking the way in which India used to operate earlier moving to a time where the organised sector is going to get stronger and stronger. So, which means now who are the guys who are going to benefit? The number one, two three players in each sector are expected to gain market share. It’s to me it’s no wonder that these companies are doing well. I’ll give you an example, paint sector— 30 years back 75 percent of the sector was unorganised and 25 percent is was organised. Today, the ratio has split- 75 percent is organised and in the process, the leader has become 100 bagger. So, if you invested one crore today it’s worth more than hundred crores. So, what we are saying is that what the process which took 25 years earlier will probably happen faster now because of all the underlying transformation that we see..The counter to that is there are a lot of spaces within India which are not necessarily owned or dominated by large caps. A bunch of sectors where the leader is an undervalued mid-cap name.Goel: So, what I’m saying is if you take any sector, the it could be a mid-cap, it could be a small cap. When we talk about growth and when we talk about quality, it does not have to be a large cap. We are saying the largest luggage manufacturer in India- it’s a company with a market cap of Rs 6,000 crore right. The company which is one of the largest small finance banks is a market cap of under Rs 20,000 crores. If you’re looking at lot of these sectors, there is a very strong underlying push.Let me give you one more example, Jewellery sector for last seven years is zero growth- Rs 4-lakh crore industry has remained Rs 4-lakh crore in the last 7 years, but the number one player has grown at 15 percent in a sector with stagnant. That is why the stock has tripled in the same time..Anshul, there’s a bit of a conundrum at play out here that the spaces that you bet on, if they are not in the top 50 fancied names may not get the rating at the time that you want. So, what would you do in order to try and nullify the down effects of a such a thing?Saigal: Very clearly, there is competition for capital and capital flows towards growth. Now, there are cycles in which certain segments grow well, there are the cycles in which other segments grow well. Let’s take the case of the last two years. You’ve seen names like HUL continue to grow, while you have building material companies not growing for various reasons. I mean, I don’t want to go dwell into too much detail, but for various reasons, that’s the situation that exists at this time.You’ve seen capital flowing to an HUL and out of building material companies- certain building material segments. Now, if your belief is that building materials is not going to grow even in the future, and this valuation is justified for this low-growth segment, then the situation will persist. But if your belief is that HUL at 80 P/E is largely building in that 15 percent growth, and if building materials can start to grow from 4-5 percent to now 15 percent, then this competition for capital will ensure that capital flows out of HUL are at least not incrementally into HUL and towards building material companies.So, it again comes down to that- what is your belief on where growth is and in which segments. If you are belief is that growth in a certain segment is going to accelerate, this sort of contraction in multiples is going to reverse..So, what segments do you pencil in that you will you believe growth will come? Forget stock prices, where is the market not pricing in the growth?Saigal: See, I was in a presentation the other day and I was telling people that we Indians are because we are close to the ground, we are very pessimistic about what’s happening in India. But think of the reason why you have foreigners lining up to come into the country. Every large company wants to come into the country. Now, for the reason that we are 1.3 billion people and our per capita income is rising. So, I can’t find a space where India will not grow. Now, of course, it may be that in cycles in the next six months orone year, there may be situations where India will not grow. But that India is going to grow over 5 or 10 years is to my mind, a given. In all segments, I do believe in addition to that, this growth is best captured when the perception of growth is low. This is that time when the perception all around is that growth is going to be weak- which is reflected in prices..So, to our judgment, this is a very attractive period to build on a strong portfolio of quality companies at attractive prices for the next three to five years. You can’t be anything but bullish on India..With that hypothesis Vikas, now I’ve known that in the past, whatever 10-12 years that we’ve known each other, you’ve identified some stellar bottom up stock picking opportunities- What are the themes that look attractive right nowKhemani: There are two categories. One is where you can get consistent compounders. I think, you will see banking and financial services has a huge potential. Still, countries going to a huge amount of penetration. We’ll see many years of compounding ahead of us- insurance, asset management and many more non-credit space players.Secondly, like know, your last two-three years set up in India, I think a few old school businesses. Where unorganised to the organised theme is at play, the manufacturing side- I think they are completely ignored. I think a lot of deep value players there, as the environment changes, you will see utilisation levels going up, pricing improving, employee operating levels coming into play. There you can find a structural change in the business cycle happening. We have a really positive outlook on that.Lastly, the structural theme- where the cycle is probably a 10-year cycle where I probably will find 15-25 baggers or maybe more. It’s hard to find good players out there right now in the real estate theme. I think the realty sector has well done well in the last year, but we think it’s a 10-year cycle. Post RERA implementation, the game has completely shifted in favour of good players with a good brand, balance sheets and the execution capability. Anybody and everybody will not be able to compete and become builders. The demand is going to be strong.. Post RERA implementation, the game has completely shifted in favour of good players with a good brand, balance sheets and the execution capability. Anybody and everybody will not be able to compete and become builders. The demand is going to be strong.Vikas Khemani, Founder, Carnelian Capital Advisors.So, the analogy I give is that- it is very much similar to what happened to capital markets post-formation of SEBI. Today, all of us are products of SEBI. Certainly, if there were no regulators, capital markets would not be of this size and scale without that. So probably real estate as a sector, I think you can see next 10-15 years of similar kind of growth trajectory. Of course, you will find good names, no new names will come. The way if we were to talk about 1992-93, a lot of new players likes of Edelweiss, IIFL and many didn’t even exist.So, I think new players will come soon current will scale up, but this sector we think, it will be changing from capital heavy to capital light. So, a lot of things are falling in place and these are the early days. Don't get carried away by one year of best realty sector performance. I think it is a huge sort of upside..That index has had a 10-year track record of really destroying wealth, so one year will not bother other people at all. So, Varun, therefore the question to you is when you are building your portfolios right now, are you still sticking to the winners?Goel: So, or us the biggest theme for the next 5 to 10 years is the shift from unorganised to organised. We have a fund woven around the theme and we believe it’s going to be an incredibly powerful theme..So, we have diagnostics- Rs 25,000-crore sector, less than Rs 5,000 crore is with the national players. Luggage—a Rs 25,000-crore sector, only Rs 10,000 crore of it is with the organised sector. Footwear—a Rs 75,000-crore sector, only Rs 25,000 crore is in the organised sector. So, all of these themes are going to do well. .Another thing that I can say is chemicals. India today and I think we all will be surprised to know is $36 billion chemical industry. In the next 6-7 years by various estimates, it could be $100-billion industry. Thanks to pollution and all those concerns in China, trade war between U.S. and China, we could see a lot of money and are coming into this space, so we believe a lot of multi-baggers can get created. So, we continue to bet on these stories.I like to make one additional point that we are going to live in a world in our view, which is going to be more and more environmental, social and governance compliant. So, in our view, lot of these companies know which are fair value today, I could be wrong, but they could become value traps because global money could be very scarce in some of these names. I strongly believe that it is impossible for me to pick rerating stories because that’s a function of how my colleagues in the industry behave and the liquidity and all that. So, I continue to back the stories that I spoke about and we believe even if we underperform for three-six months, it is okay but from a five-year point of view, I think we should do well..Value today could remain value forever too. Anshul, you mentioned it’s very hard to not be bullish on India- quick thoughts, themes?Saigal: Building materials, we are positive on that space, consumption very positive on that space. There are in fact value opportunities as we speak in consumption spaces. We’re very positive also on certain segments of capital goods, real estate. I mean, to the point that we are all products of the dematerialisation, what is happening in real estate today is something akin to what happened in equities when dematerialisation played out. So real estate is another space, quality balance sheets will work very well.. I think that for the next five years, the huge competitive advantage that a strong balance sheet will give you is something that will propel strength in the balance sheet to strength in market share in a space. To that extent, strong balance sheet companies across sectors are ones that will gain market share going forward. Anshul Saigal, head, Kotak PMS.We do think that sector after sector offers opportunity, you just have to dig deeper and look for those opportunities..The last 8-9 years show unequivocally that the largest wealth creators are amongst the top 800 companies, if I’m not wrong, have been companies which were in 2011 value. Very few which were trading at premium have created wealth. Does that give any insight about what the next 8-9 years could do?Vartak: I think it’s important to understand that the biggest problem that India faces today is unemployment and that’s going to get more and more acute. Because you look at the top employing industries, whether it’s real estate, the smaller players are out of business, many of them. The larger players do not need as many employees as the smaller players needed.The auto ancillary, auto industry, it’s getting so much more automated that there is very little incremental hiring and you have such a huge population, which is coming into the employment base. The same thing is with textiles, what is the government going to do? I mean, there is no option but to attract more and more manufacturing in India. So, I think if you look at the steps that they’ve taken, it’s in that direction, because I’m pretty sure that’s the top-most priority for the government. So, if you don’t address this in three to four years, you will have social unrest and you are seeing signs of that.I think the corporate tax cuts, especially for the new companies to come in is to attract these manufacturing companies into India, you will probably have to focus on the job-creating industries, which could be tourism. So, for all of that, the theme is going to be your you will have to build factories, the companies who come from outside will build factories, you will need to build airports, you need to build infrastructure. So, I think building material is definitely going to be one of those themes but again, you got to be very careful in that.You have to pick niche players, where there are only one or two players. The barrier to enter that business is going to be very high. The gestation period for someone to come into that industry has to be very long, so you can’t bet on generic building materials, but you will have to look at specialised building materials. It could be some structural engineering side or in the electrical cable side, but those are going to be in high demand.So, I’ll focus on many of those businesses. It’s not that they have stagnated, they have done well beyond most of these quality companies. You look at the last 10 years of history, their growth has been about 20 percent in the worst of the economic environment, and they are still trading at 13-15 times multiple and these are companies which are having a high return on capital employed. So, I just can’t believe that these companies if the economy picks up, can trade anything less than at least 2 times of the valuation where they’re at now.

Value Vs Growth: Here’s What These Portfolio Managers Think

Where do portfolio managers stand on the growth versus value debate?

Choose a plan