Treasury Bond Gurus Blindsided Again as Reflation Trade Falters
Treasury Bond Gurus Blindsided Again as Reflation Trade Falters
(Bloomberg) -- It’s never been easy being a bond-market prognosticator. But while history is strewn with botched calls and embarrassing revisions, 2017 is shaping up to be particularly tricky for would-be forecasters.
Not only is there the Federal Reserve to worry about, but also a new U.S. administration struggling to enact its pro-growth policies and geopolitical risks from elections across Europe to saber rattling in North Korea.
Perhaps that’s why on Wall Street, consensus estimates for the direction of Treasuries are proving to be so off the mark. Strategists and economists were blindsided by the five-week rally in Treasuries, which left the gap between their forecasts for the end of June and the actual 10-year yield at the widest since September. In theory, they’d converge as the date draws closer.
To some, the disparity reflects a growing sense that traders in the Treasury market are giving up, at least for now, on the so-called reflation trade that was all the rage in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory in November.
“I don’t know that the words ‘confident’ and ‘yield forecasts’ belong in the same sentence,” said Richard Moody, chief economist at Regions Financial. “Our forecasts have been based on where the market was, which is how you have to do it, but we’ve been saying since the day after the election that people need to slow down in terms of what they’re expecting.”
Moody, who called for the 10-year yield to end the quarter at 2.71 percent in March, dropped his forecast to 2.46 percent on April 13.
Pervasive Trend
Higher yields have been a core component of the reflation trade, which was pinned on expectations of faster growth and inflation, as well as tighter monetary policy by the Fed and other central banks. Ten-year yields more than doubled from their all-time low in July to 2.63 percent on March 14.
Since then, yields have retreated, falling victim to some of the same trends that led to the pervasive idea that rates would stay lower for longer. They were hovering around 2.3 percent on Tuesday.
That view is reflected in something called the term premium. As its name suggests, the metric should normally be positive and has been for almost all of the past 50 years. Yet it’s back in negative territory -- an anomaly that first emerged as a result of the Fed’s quantitative easing -- suggesting investors can’t see any risks on the horizon that would push yields higher.
“We’re acknowledging that the term premium will stay lower than we thought,” said Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics. The firm reduced its June forecast by a half-percentage point to 2.5 percent, the biggest cut among those in the latest Bloomberg survey. “The market is not convinced that the Fed is going to follow through or the economy is going to be strong.”
Mark Kiesel, Pimco’s chief investment officer of global credit, disagrees and says investors are underestimating the Fed’s intent to raise rates.
“The market is wrong in terms of only pricing one hike this year and a little over one hike next year,” he said. “The Fed is going to do more than that.”
Lowered Expectations
Indeed, futures traders are pricing in just one more increase this year, likely in September.
Scott Minerd says the low-yield camp will ultimately prevail. Minerd, who co-manages the $5.7 billion Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund, said the odds have risen that yields will fall to 1.5 percent over the next several months. As of Feb. 28, the fund’s largest holding was the principal portion of a stripped Treasury bond due in 2044, among the most profitable to own as rates fall.
The outlook for inflation suggests that there’s no need for the Fed to rush. Bond investors see little chance that U.S. consumer prices will rise more than 2 percent a year, on average, over the next three decades. The reading is close to the lowest since November.
“We’re seeing a lot of signs that inflation is not picking up,” BlackRock Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink said on Bloomberg Television last week. “There’s a 51 percent probability that the 10-year Treasury can go below 2 percent.”
--With assistance from Alexandria Arnold
To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Chappatta in New York at bchappatta1@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Boris Korby at bkorby1@bloomberg.net, Michael Tsang