The Indian Stock Market Is Unique. Here Is The Data.BloombergQuintOpinion
“In the late 1990s Rupert Murdoch visited India to explore launching satellite and cable joint-venture operations… After meeting all the government ministers in New Delhi, he flew to Mumbai…to meet Dhirubhai Ambani… Ambani asked Murdoch who he had met in Delhi. Murdoch said that he had met the PM, the Finance Minister and others. ‘Ah, you’ve met all the right people, said Ambani, ‘but if you want to get anywhere in India you must meet all the wrong people.’ By this he meant the corrupt politicians….” – Edward Luce in ‘In spite of the Gods: the Strange Rise of Modern India’ (2006).
A Rigorous Data Crunch Singles Out India
Using quarterly data for the last 18 years, we used regression analysis to understand the impact of three macro variables: year-on year change in exchange rates, GDP growth, and interest rates on stock prices.
In contrast, in the two biggest stock markets in the world – the United States and Japan – the corresponding figures are 34 percent and 35 percent respectively, implying that in these markets, company-specific factors are responsible for two-thirds of shareholder returns.
In the largest emerging market-China, macro factors explain only 25 percent of the variability in share prices.
The only emerging market which is comparable to India is Brazil where 53 percent of the variability in share prices is driven by macro factors.
But this is to be expected for Brazil is primarily a commodity dependent economy.
So why does the Indian stock market stand out in its dependence on macros?
We can think of three good reasons why stock prices in India are primarily dependent on macro factors:
1. India Is Still Fundamentally A Feudal Society
India is still fundamentally a feudal society with our politicians being the kings. As a result, most sectors are still heavily regulated by the centre, the state and by local government.
For example, to start a hotel in Mumbai one needs almost 60 clearances from various layers of government.
A case study currently playing out in front of us which demonstrates nicely why macros dominates in India is the NBFC crisis. When the NBFCs realised that they will struggle to refinance their commercial paper they, as a group, ran straight to New Delhi which responded with a majestic show of power.
The UPA Government too was a masterly exponent of political patronage. Read this story for an example.
2. Factors Of Production Expensive In India
Factors of production are much more expensive in India as compared to other large economies. For almost the entire period under consideration (2001-18), the cost of borrowing for small and medium enterprises in India has been well in excess of 11 percent. In contrast, in economies like China, Japan and the U.S., SMEs borrow at rates well below 5 percent. Minimum wages in India are 3 times that in Bangladesh (and this in spite of the fact that Bangladesh has healthier, more literate workers).
3. Segmenting The Indian Stock Market: North Versus South
If we could segment the Indian stock market in south versus north terms, it is highly likely that in the south we would see company-specific factors being more important than the north.
The north of India—specifically the area between the Pakistan and Bangladesh borders—is an economic disaster without parallel in the post-World War II era.
Per capita income there is less than half that of the south. Female labour force participation there is lower than in Pakistan and Afghanistan. On human development indicators, north India is on par only with war-torn African countries. If you exclude the megapolis around Delhi, in north India it does not make sense to even talk about company-specific factors.
If you are managing money in India, you have to be able to understand the macro economy. If you can’t understand where the cost of funding or the exchange rate will go in India, you will have a tough time managing an Indian equities portfolio no matter how good your stock selection skills are.
Secondly, because the macro is tough in India, very few companies are able to outperform over extended periods of time.
If, for example, you ran a data crunch on the 1990s and looked for companies, which over that decade, grew revenues each year by at least double digits alongside at least 12 percent post-tax return on capital employed, you would find only five companies – NIIT, Cipla, HeroMoto, Swaraj Engines and HDFC.
The good news is that if you purchased these stocks in 2000, by 2010 your portfolio would be up almost 10 times. A similar data crunch in 2018 would give you 12 companies.
Companies who survive the vicissitudes of India’s macros are world-class and you profit from backing these stocks.
Thirdly, if life does get incrementally easier for SMEs going forward (India’s upward movement in World Bank’s ‘Ease of Doing Business’ is encouraging on this front), and if the cost of funding does fall for SMEs going forward (again, the past decade has been encouraging on this front), then the investment paradigm will change in India.
One could then look to buy top quality small cap companies and stay invested with them over extended periods, much like the young Warren Buffett did in post-World War-II America.
Also read: The Traits Of An Effective CEO
Saurabh Mukherjea is the author of “The Unusual Billionaires” and “Coffee Can Investing: the Low Risk Route to Stupendous Wealth”. He’s also the Founder of Marcellus Investment Managers, a provider of Portfolio Management Services.
The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Bloomberg Quint or its editorial team.