Reluctant Fed Likely to Cut Rates Again as Trade War Intensifies
The Federal Open Market Committee, however reluctantly, is poised to cut rates again at its Sept. 17-18 meeting.
(Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve will be leaning closer to reducing interest rates again next month after President Donald Trump ratcheted up his trade war with China and the central bank may even have to cut more steeply than it did last week.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell called last week’s quarter-point reduction a “mid-cycle adjustment to policy,’’ not the first in a long series of moves. Yet the ratcheting up of global tensions -- which stands to hit consumers harder than in the first year of the tariff battle -- has further boosted uncertainty for businesses and sent stocks and U.S. Treasury yields plummeting.
“I am certainly monitoring developments very closely,” Fed Governor Lael Brainard said at a Kansas City Fed event Monday in response to an audience question on the sharp market movements, adding “we’re committed to sustaining the expansion.”
The upshot is that the Federal Open Market Committee, however reluctantly, is poised to cut rates again at its Sept. 17-18 meeting, with investors putting about 35% chances on a half-point reduction. While the Fed has no say over trade policy, it can try to ease financial conditions and support growth by lowering borrowing costs.
“If this continues, the odds of a 50 basis-point move are higher,’’ said Neil Dutta, head of economics at Renaissance Macro Research in New York. “The downside risks to growth have increased. The haphazard nature with which this policy is being pursued creates uncertainty and companies don’t know what is happening next.’’ That will “freeze activity,’’ he said.
Stocks recorded their biggest loss this year after China struck back in its trade dispute with the U.S. and let the yuan tumble to the weakest level in more than a decade. Rates on 10-year Treasury notes sank to 1.72% on Monday, deepening a yield-curve inversion compared to three-month bills that has preceded economic downturns.
“A 50 basis-point move in September is much closer to the base case now,’’ said Ed Al-Hussainy, senior interest-rate and currency analyst at Columbia Management in Minneapolis. “If this is a precautionary cutting cycle, let’s take this insurance out right now. A 25 basis-point move now is disproportionate to the risks that are on the table.”
What Bloomberg’s Economists Say
“If the president follows through on the threatened escalation of tariffs, more aggressive counter-measures from the Fed will be warranted, possibly as much as 75 bps of additional easing by year-end.”
-- Carl Riccadonna, Yelena Shulyatyeva and Eliza Winger
Powell described last week’s action as insurance, similar to the actions Alan Greenspan took in 1995-96, to keep the 1990s economic expansion intact.
Another reason to move: The decline in interest rates globally suggests the neutral interest rate -- the level which neither speeds up nor retards growth -- is lower. Brainard, in a 2015 speech, noted that “the foreign outlook has become increasingly important as a source of downward pressure on the neutral rate in the past few years.’’
One reason the Fed might be cautious is that Trump’s trade policy has whipsawed markets, with a tweet creating market concern one day only to be resolved shortly after. In June, for example, Trump threatened tariffs on Mexico related to its immigration policy, only to drop the plans days later.
Moreover, the direct impact of the new tariffs is relatively small on the U.S. economy, said Charles Lieberman, chief investment officer at Advisors Capital Management in Ridgewood, New Jersey. “The psychological effect is more important,’’ he said.
Another factor that may weigh on Powell and Co.’s mind is that monetary policy actions typically have effects that take place for a year or more. That could see the Fed cutting rates this year, only to have Trump reach a deal in 2020 “that boosts sentiment, but the Fed feels reluctant to take back the cuts because of the approaching presidential election,’’ Goldman Sachs Group Inc. economists led by Jan Hatzius said in a note Sunday.
Two FOMC voters -- Kansas City Fed President Esther George and Boston’s Eric Rosengren – dissented last week, citing solid data and worries of financial instability, and two other Fed officials expressed reluctance to cut rates prior to the meeting.
George, appearing on stage alongside Brainard on Monday, said “markets move quickly. It takes some time to see how that evolves. And so the best I think that you can do right now is just to monitor and see how that unfolds.”
While consumer spending data have been solid, business investment has been faltering and manufacturing weak.
“They will go in September, but it’s unclear how much they can actually do to shore up confidence in a world when policy can shift in the speed of a tweet,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist with Grant Thornton LLP in Chicago. “The Fed is between a rock and a hard place.’’
To contact the reporters on this story: Steve Matthews in Atlanta at smatthews@bloomberg.net;Craig Torres in Washington at ctorres3@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Margaret Collins at mcollins45@bloomberg.net, Scott Lanman, Alister Bull
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.