ADVERTISEMENT

Rajat Gupta Fails to Have Insider-Trading Conviction Tossed

Rajat Gupta Fails to Have 2012 Insider-Trading Conviction Tossed

(Bloomberg) -- A federal appeals court in Manhattan declined to throw out former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. director Rajat Gupta’s 2012 insider-trading conviction, upholding a lower-court ruling.

Gupta, who was released from prison in 2016 after serving 19 months, argued that the conviction should be thrown out because U.S. prosecutors failed to prove he got a personal benefit for passing tips to his friend, billionaire hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam.

Gupta’s challenge was based on a 2014 ruling by the appeals court in U.S. v. Newman, which made it harder for prosecutors to prove insider trading. That ruling led to the dismissal of charges against Michael Steinberg, a former fund manager at SAC Capital Advisors LP, and to more than a dozen insider-trading cases falling apart. A key provision of the Newman decision was later rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in a different case, however.

That made it tougher for Gupta, who had already lost a direct appeal of his conviction. He sued in 2015 arguing that the Newman ruling should be applied to free him from prison. The trial judge disagreed and the appeals court followed suit in its ruling on Monday.

A federal jury in New York found Gupta guilty of passing tips to Rajaratnam about Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs and the bank’s financial results for two quarters in 2008. While Gupta has already served his prison term, a ruling in his favor would have cleared the conviction from his record.

In the ruling on Monday, a three-judge panel rejected Gupta’s claims that he was actually innocent of the charges and disagreed that the jury was improperly instructed.

Rajaratnam, a founder of the Galleon Group, was convicted in 2011 of masterminding a multimillion-dollar insider-trading scheme and sentenced to 11 years in prison. He’s due to be released in July 2021, accord to the Federal Bureau of Prisons website.

The case is Gupta v. U.S., 15-2707, Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (Manhattan).

To contact the reporter on this story: Bob Van Voris in federal court in Manhattan at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Glovin at dglovin@bloomberg.net, Joe Schneider, Peter Jeffrey

©2019 Bloomberg L.P.