U.S. Treasury Refrains From Naming Any Currency Manipulators
The U.S. Treasury again stopped short of labeling any foreign economies as manipulators of their exchange rates.
(Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Treasury again stopped short of labeling any foreign economies as manipulators of their exchange rates, while continuing to say that Taiwan and Vietnam met all three criteria for the designation.
Switzerland dropped off the list, last published in April, of countries exceeding the three thresholds, with officials saying it violated two of the criteria while narrowly missing a third.
The Treasury has had “enhanced engagement” with all three of the countries, the department said Friday in a statement accompanying its semiannual report to Congress on macroeconomic and foreign exchange policies of major U.S. trading partners
“Treasury is working relentlessly to promote a stronger and more balanced global recovery that benefits American workers, including through close engagement with major economies on currency-related issues,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in a statement that accompanied the report.
The Treasury said it was “satisfied with progress made by Vietnam to date” on addressing exchange-rate issues.
‘Insufficient Evidence’
As in April, the Treasury concluded there was “insufficient evidence” to designate Switzerland, Taiwan and Vietnam as manipulators of their currencies, even while saying that two had met thresholds for that label.
Treasury said 12 countries had exceeded two of the three criteria. They included: China, Japan, Korea, Germany, Ireland, Italy, India, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Mexico and Switzerland.
“Although Switzerland no longer meets all three criteria for enhanced analysis, Treasury will continue to conduct an in-depth analysis of Switzerland until it does not meet all three criteria under the 2015 Act for at least two consecutive reports,” Treasury said.
On China, the Treasury said it’s “increasingly an outlier with respect to its non-disclosure of foreign exchange market intervention,” compared with other major economies.
China Discrepancy
China’s official foreign-exchange reserves rose by $102 billion over the four quarters through June, compared with a gain of almost $278 billion in a separate gauge of foreign-exchange purchases -- the biggest 12-month figure since 2014, according to the Treasury.
“The precise causes for the large divergence” remain unclear, the Treasury said, citing the potential that “the full range of China’s intervention methods” might not be fully captured by some central bank data. The department also said it will closely monitor the foreign-exchange activities of China’s state-owned banks.
In its latest release, the Treasury -- for the first time since its May 2019 report -- made adjustments to its criteria for identifying policies that indicate potential currency manipulation.
Among the tweaks, the Treasury raised the threshold related to a country’s current-account surplus to 3% of gross domestic product, from 2%, while lowering the bilateral trade surplus threshold to $15 billion from $20 billion.
| Newly Adjusted U.S. Manipulation Criteria |
|---|
|
Speaking on a call with reporters, a senior Treasury official said the current-account threshold was raised to help identify more precisely where unfair currency practices were emerging, as opposed to being triggered by conditions driven by economic circumstances.
Under President Joe Biden and Yellen, the Treasury has so far taken a less aggressive approach to the review than during the previous administration. During Donald Trump’s administration, the Treasury abruptly designated China a manipulator only to lift the label five months later to win concessions in a trade deal. The developments raised concerns that the report was being increasingly politicized.
The latest report assesses exchange rates and economic policies in the four quarters through June 2021.
A manipulator designation has no specific or immediate consequence, but the law requires the administration to engage with those trading partners to address the perceived exchange-rate imbalance. Penalties, including exclusion from U.S. government contracts, could be applied after a year if the label remains.
©2021 Bloomberg L.P.