EU Takes China to the WTO Over Technology-Transfer Practices

(Bloomberg) -- The European Union complained to the World Trade Organization about China’s technology-transfer practices in a surprise move that adds to U.S. political pressure on Beijing.

On the same day it filed a WTO complaint over U.S. metal tariffs, the EU turned to the global trade arbiter to challenge Chinese intellectual-property legislation that forces European companies going to China to grant ownership or usage rights to local entities. China already faces the threat of U.S. duties on as much as $150 billion of Chinese goods sold in the American market as a result of alleged IP theft.

“We are challenging today both the U.S. and China at the WTO and it demonstrates that we are not choosing any sides,” EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom told reporters on Friday in Brussels. “We stand for the multilateral system, for rules-based global trade.”

The EU complaints against China and the U.S. highlight political cross currents that are buffeting the global trade order and shaking up traditional alliances.

National Security

The case against Washington over metal-import levies that President Donald Trump has justified on national-security grounds puts Europe in the camp of China, which complained to the WTO right after the U.S. imposed the measures on March 23. The EU followed suit after losing an exemption and, in a separate move, intends to hit U.S. goods with a retaliatory tariff as soon as June 20.

“It is pure protectionism,” Malmstrom said. “European steel and aluminum exports to the U.S. cannot be seen as threat to their internal security.”

The technology-transfer case against Beijing runs parallel to the Trump administration’s use of part of a 1974 U.S. trade law -- section 301 -- to press China to address IP-related concerns such as trade-secret theft, online piracy and forced technology transfer.

It is in that context that the U.S. has started a WTO case against China and been threatening duties on a range of Chinese goods. Beijing has responded with a WTO complaint of its own.

‘Dangerous Game’

While the EU has loudly criticized Trump’s “America First” agenda and his protectionist tilt, the 28-nation bloc has expressed support in Geneva for U.S. calls for stronger IP protection in China.

“Technological innovation and know-how is the bedrock of our knowledge-based economy,” Malmstrom said. “It’s what keeps our companies competitive in the global market. We cannot let any country force our companies to surrender this hard-earned knowledge at its border.”

In its complaint, the EU is targeting rules in China on the import and export of technologies and on Chinese-foreign equity joint ventures. Certain provisions “discriminate against non-Chinese companies and treat them worse than domestic ones,” violating WTO requirements that foreign businesses be put on an equal footing and that IP such as patents be protected, according to the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm.

EU-China relations have also been strained in recent years by Chinese steel overcapacity, low-priced exports of numerous goods that undercut rival manufacturers in their home markets, domestic barriers to foreign investment and aggressive overseas acquisitions -- all issues of concern to the U.S. as well.

In a further sign of shifting alliances, the Trump administration’s decisions to pull out of a landmark global agreement to fight climate change and to abandon an international accord aimed at preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons have pushed Europe and China closer together.

Malmstrom’s harshest comments on Friday were directed at the Trump administration, whose metal levies she said are creating the risk of “severe turbulence in the markets,” putting economic growth in jeopardy and “further weakening” trans-Atlantic relations.

“The U.S. is playing a dangerous game,” Malmstrom said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Jonathan Stearns in Brussels at jstearns2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Alan Crawford at acrawford6@bloomberg.net, Richard Bravo, Jones Hayden

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.