Finance Ministry Puts Measures To Protect Prudent Commercial Decision Of Bankers
There are widespread apprehension that bankers could be hauled up for their bona fide commercial decision go wrong.
With a view to protect prudent commercial decision of bankers, the government has taken a slew of decisions, including doing away with personal responsibilities of managing director and chief executive officers of state-owned banks for compliance in dealing with large value frauds committed by bank officials.
Powers have been delegated by Department of Financial Services to the Boards of public sector lenders to put in place a suitable mechanism for ensuring compliance of the various timelines laid down in Reserve Bank of India and Chief Vigilance Comissions circulars, an official statement said.
"Similarly, the instructions of DFS of 2015 regarding compulsory examination of fraud for all NPA accounts exceeding Rs 50 crores have been aligned with the CVC circular of January 15, 2020 whereby all such cases of suspicious fraud are to be initially referred to the Advisory Board for Banking and Financial Frauds (ABBFF) headed by former vigilance Commissioner TM Bhasin," it added.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman at several occasions assured bankers that adequate measures would be taken to protect honest commercial decisions taken by them and distinction would be made between genuine commercial failures and culpability.
There are widespread apprehension that bankers could be hauled up for their bona fide commercial decision go wrong.
To assuage concerns, the finance minister had assured the bankers that a distinction would be made between genuine commercial failures and culpability last month in a meeting with heads of the public sector banks, which was also attended by the CBI Director.
She had also told bankers that the Central Bureau of Investigation will have discussions, and workshops with the bank officials from the level of vigilance officers, senior managers to general managers to explain and eliminate apprehension from their minds.
Considering the complexities involved in the commercial decisions of managers in public sector firms, the Central Vigilance Commission set up the Advisory Board for Banking and Financial Frauds for a mandatory first-level examination on suspected frauds in excess of Rs 50 crore, involving public servants equivalent in rank to GMs and above, before enquiry or investigations begin.
In order to boost staff morale and reduce scope for harassment, Sitharaman had also directed public sector bank heads to clear long pending vigilance cases against their officials for alleged malpractices.
The banks should form a panel headed by general manager and it should either take decision to pursue the case with timeline or close the file of long pending vigilance cases, she had instructed.
In line with the decision taken in the meeting, the finance ministry has separately directed banks on Jan. 27 to set up a committee of senior officers to monitor progress of pending disciplinary and internal vigilance cases as procedural delay, on one hand, adversely affects morale of the employees and on the other, breeds inefficiencies in the system.
Therefore, it said, every bank must set up a Committee of Senior Officers to review pending disciplinary and internal vigilance cases and frame timelines to reduce delays in deciding such cases.
As part of this endeavour of government, Section 17A was incorporated in Prevention of Corruption Act, requiring prior permission before initiating investigation against a public servant, it said. These measures taken will improve sentiment among bankers and help them take lending decisions to drive economy facing slowdown.