ADVERTISEMENT

Huawei's Ties to China's Military Aren't the Problem

Huawei's Ties to China's Military Aren't the Problem

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- At first blush, the optics of Huawei Technologies Co. staff working alongside China’s military aren’t great.

Company employees teamed up with various organs of the Peoples’ Liberation Army on at least 10 research endeavors over the past decade, spanning artificial intelligence and radio communications, Bloomberg News reported Thursday, citing publicly available documents.

Among the joint projects: extracting and classifying emotions in online video comments, and an initiative with the elite National University of Defense Technology on collection and analysis of satellite images and geographical coordinates. Just the types of surveillance research that most rattles the West. These aren’t even core areas of Huawei’s telecommunications business, which only raises more questions about the depth of its relationship with Beijing.

Corporate-military research collaboration isn’t a novelty. It happens in almost every country. The problem is that the Shenzhen-based company has spent considerable time and energy trying to weaken any perception that it’s tied to the Chinese government.

“We have no cooperation with the military on research,” founder Ren Zhengfei said to reporters in Shenzhen in January, according to a transcript Huawei provided to Bloomberg News. “Perhaps we sell them a small amount of civilian equipment. Just how much, I’m not clear on because we don’t regard them as a core customer.”

The U.S. has long been suspicious of the equipment maker’s connections to the Chinese government, and has taken steps to hem in the reach of its 5G technology, citing national-security concerns. In recent months, the Trump administration has pressured allies to block the company and barred U.S. manufacturers from selling equipment to Huawei, among other Chinese firms.

Supplying superfast connectivity beyond Huawei’s domestic market has been lucrative. While there’s still plenty of business – even U.S. allies such as the U.K. and Germany haven’t excluded Huawei completely – any scaling back of those ambitions threatens this growth momentum.

That’s why, if Huawei’s ties to the PLA aren’t nefarious, greater transparency would go a long way. AT&T Inc., for example, has well-disclosed contracts for work with the U.S. army. Alphabet Inc.’s Google had a drone contract with the Pentagon, before opting not to renew it after employee backlash.

Now Huawei is left with three choices: deny its ties to the PLA, play them down, or claim ignorance. Judging from its initial response to the Bloomberg News story, it seems to have opted for the last choice. Should this shift to denial, Huawei’s credibility worldwide might diminish. 

That leaves “playing it down” as the most likely strategy, including the classic block-and-bridge tactic of trying to reroute questions, or shifting focus to U.S. examples.

Maybe the research collaboration by Huawei’s employees has purely civilian applications. But with the world’s attention on it, this is no time to be coy.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rachel Rosenthal at rrosenthal21@bloomberg.net

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. He previously covered technology for Bloomberg News.

©2019 Bloomberg L.P.