The performances underscore the challenges facing the two descendants of John D. Rockefeller’s sprawling 19th century empire. For Chevron, it’s about rewarding long-suffering investors who had funded costly natural gas projects in Australia for more than a decade. For Exxon, Chief Executive Officer Darren Woods is tasked with rebuilding an asset base that analysts say didn’t receive enough investment over the past 10 years.
“Exxon’s strategy is at odds with what the market is currently looking for,” Mark Stoeckle, who manages $2.4 billion including Exxon and Chevron shares at Adams Express Co. in Boston. “Chevron’s a darling right now. It’s the juxtaposition of a company with high investment and little production growth with one that’s harvesting cash.”
Investors are rewarding Chevron, given their preference for immediate payback after the 2014-2016 oil price crushed returns. Meanwhile, Exxon is a long-term bet, with Woods anticipating capital expenditure swelling to more than $30 billion a year well into the next decade.
"Chevron was very, very strong on really good upstream,” Jason Gammel, a London-based analyst at Jefferies LLC, said in a phone interview. “Exxon was a bit disappointing.” The result: Exxon tumbled as much as 5.4 percent in New York, the worst intraday performance in 2 1/2 months. Chevron climbed 2 percent.
- Exxon CEO Woods to Break Long-Held Practice of Quarterly Silence
- Forget Oil. Exxon’s Profit Can’t Even Keep Pace on Chemicals
- Exxon Surrenders Halliburton-Sized Chunk in Market-Value Crash
Virtually all of Exxon’s rivals posted healthy results this week, reaping the benefits of rebounding crude prices. Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA and Eni SpA reported their best performances since 2014, when a barrel of oil cost more than $100. Brent crude closed this year’s first quarter at $70 and has since marched toward $75.
Production surged for Exxon’s peers as well, with French giant Total SA reporting record output. The result still weren’t enough to satisfy all investors, however. Shell shares declined amid questions about its commitment to a buying back shares while Eni slipped after disclosing weak cash flow.
As for Exxon, Woods has said it’s wise to invest now when others are reining in spending and returning cash to shareholders.
Irving, Texas-based Exxon pumped the equivalent of 3.889 million barrels a day in the quarter, the first sub-4 million figure for that time of year in almost two decades. The number was also lower than all seven estimates from analysts in a Bloomberg survey. The company’s first-quarter profit of $1.09 a share was also below analyst estimates.
Chevron, in comparison, earned $1.90 a share during the first three months of the year, well in excess of the $1.47 average of 18 estimates in a Bloomberg survey of analysts. The company also pumped more crude and natural gas than observers anticipated, Chevron said Friday in a statement, enhancing the benefits from rallying oil prices.
Major oil producers in Europe, meanwhile, have posted some of their best quarterly results in years amid an oil rally driven by OPEC-led production cuts, geopolitical threats and swelling demand.
With in-built production growth from previous years’ spending, Chevron increased its dividend 3.7 percent earlier this year. But what investors are really looking for is for a resumption of its share buyback program that was suspended in 2015.
In March, CEO Mike Wirth said he’d like to do this but cautioned that board members “want to see the cash flow materialize.”
Woods, in his second year at the helm, has said buybacks rank below dividends and investments in five key long-term projects from Brazil to Papua New Guinea. Those projects are crucial to future earnings and further opportunities can be more cheaply bought as are rivals retreating, he said in March.
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.