ADVERTISEMENT

Bharti Airtel, Vodafone, Idea Caused Rs 400-Crore Loss To Government: Reliance Jio

Any delay in taking action would set a very bad precedent, Reliance Jio said.



Customers wait to recharge their mobile phones as a vendor checks another device at a mobile phone store in the Dharavi slum area of Mumbai, India, on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2014. Photographer: Dhiraj Singh/Bloomberg
Customers wait to recharge their mobile phones as a vendor checks another device at a mobile phone store in the Dharavi slum area of Mumbai, India, on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2014. Photographer: Dhiraj Singh/Bloomberg

Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. has filed a complaint with the telecom ministry alleging that incumbents Bharti Airtel Ltd., Vodafone India and Idea Cellular Ltd. did not deposit the requisite licence fee in March, which led to a potential loss of Rs 400 crore to the government.

The Mukesh Ambani-led firm alleged that Airtel, Vodafone India and Idea Cellular, in utter violation of licence rules "unilaterally, wilfully and intentionally paid the advance licence fee for last quarter" of the financial year 2016-17 on the basis of estimated adjusted gross revenue (AGR), which was much lower than "the licence stipulation to pay the licence fee not less than the fee paid for the third quarter".

According to the complaint, Airtel paid around Rs 950 crore as the licence fee for January-March 2017. The amount, Reliance Jio alleges, was Rs 150 crore less than Rs 1,099.50 crore licence fee paid by Airtel for October-December 2017.

According to the rules, a telecom operator is required to pay licence fee for January-March period based on expected revenue but it should not be less than the fee paid for the third quarter of the same fiscal.

Similarly, Reliance Jio said, Vodafone paid Rs 550 crore which was Rs 200 crore less as compared to Rs 746.8-crore licence fee it paid in the third quarter. Idea paid Rs 60 crore less fee than Rs 609.4 crore paid in the previous quarter, Jio alleged.

The said act of the incumbent telecom service providers (TSPs) has caused potential financial loss amounting to over Rs 400 crore to the government exchequer and in any event has caused a revenue shortfall of the said amount in financial year 2016-17.
Reliance Jio Statement

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) denied the allegation stating that there will be no loss to the government as AGR will be trued up to actual in the subsequent quarter.

These allegations are both mischievous and ironic, with no basis in fact, if what we’re hearing from the media is true. COAI is not in receipt of any such communication.
Rajan Mathews, Director General, COAI

COAI had requested the Department of Telecom (DoT) to allow its member companies to pay the licence fee for the fourth quarter on the basis of the estimated AGR instead of on the basis of higher estimated AGR for the period and actual licence fee paid for the third quarter purportedly due to the financial conditions of the telecom operators.

Reliance Jio said the DoT "did not rightfully accede" to COAI's request but it has learnt that the department is now considering the industry body’s request "which is admittedly a gross violation of licence conditions and any relief will tantamount to rewarding a party in breach".

The company said that cannot allow leniency for COAI and should "not condone the wilful, deliberate and unilateral breach of licence conditions as it would affect the level- playing field to be afforded to all licensees".

Demanding action against incumbent operators in the form of penalty up to Rs 50 crore per service area (there are 22 service areas in India), termination of licence as per rules, among others, Reliance Jio said it has paid the advance licence fee fully in compliance with the conditions and does not agree with the views expressed by the COAI.

"Any delay in taking action would set a very bad precedent, wherein licensees would unilaterally decide to breach licence conditions and just inform the licensor about it," Jio said.

Mathews said the decline in revenue was never contemplated when setting the licence conditions and hence the request was in response to an unanticipated event or foreseen in the licence.

"We have submitted our factual representation of what the industry is going through and a bare reading of that will adequately clarify that our members have categorically stated, even in their submission to DoT that they will confirm and pay the licence fee on or before April 15, 2017. With this, there is no loss to the government also as the licence fee will be paid on actual revenue," Mathews said.