- Earlier, Kingfisher Airlines, Vijay Mallya, and Raghunathan were convicted in connection with two cheque bounce cases involving Rs 50 lakh each.
- A Hyderabad court imposed a fine of 20,000 fine, in each case, on Raghunath on Thursday.
- The matter relates to cheques issued by Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. to GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd. (GHIAL).
A local court in Hyderabad on Thursday sentenced A Raghunathan, former chief financial officer of Kingfisher Airlines Ltd., to 18 months’ imprisonment in connection with two cheque bounce cases filed against him and businessman Vijay Mallya by GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd. Third Special Court Magistrate M Krishna Rao also imposed Rs 20,000 fine in each case on Raghunathan after the latter appeared before the court.
Earlier, on several occasions, the order on quantum of punishment had got adjourned as the warrant issued against Raghunathan was still pending. The court had on April 20 convicted Kingfisher Airlines, Mallya and Raghunathan, in connection with two cheque bounce cases involving Rs 50 lakh each, under relevant sections of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter relates to cheques issued by Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. to GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd. (GHIAL), which operates the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, towards charges for using the facilities at the airport for Kingfisher Airlines flights.
During arguments on Thursday, GHIAL counsel G Ashok Reddy submitted that it was after five months Raghunathan had finally appeared before this court. He further informed that Vijay Mallya is absconding and is out of the country, and sought the court to proceed with sentence order against Raghunathan.
Raghunathan’s counsel said that several warrants were issued by different courts and he was unable to appear before this court. He sought for splitting the case against Raghunathan. He had appeared before other courts in the past few days in connection with non-bailable warrants issued against him after he had moved the high court and got the warrants recalled.
Reddy argued that the high court in its order (for the recall of warrants) had “made it clear that its order will not stand in way when the matter reached at the stage of judgement, pronouncement of sentence or conviction of the accused in the case”.
The court had earlier issued non-bailable warrants against Kingfisher Airlines, its chairman Mallya and Raghunathan on the ground of dishonouring the two cheques. It had earlier said that before imposing the quantum of punishment, it would hear the plea of the convicts (Mallya and others, who had so far not appeared/attended the court), and then pass its order with regard to sentencing them or imposing fine or both.
As per the GMR counsel, a total of 17 cases have been filed against Kingfisher Airlines in different courts over an outstanding amount of Rs 22.5 crore, which it owes to GMR. The cases are in different stages of trial.
The magistrate told Raghunathan that he has been found guilty under relevant sections of Negotiable Instruments Act. Raghunathan told the court that “I was only an employee of United Spirits Ltd. I was on rolls of United Spirits. My services seconded to Kingfisher Airlines Limited. I was always an employee of United Spirits and retired in July 2013.”
The magistrate, in his order, sentenced Raghunathan to undergo one year and six months imprisonment and also imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 in each case. The magistrate further said Raghunathan can file appeal against the judgement of this court in the case. Ashok Reddy, citing certain court rulings, submitted that this court can pass sentence against the company and also against Vijay Mallya.
“One of the accused is present in the court and the court is requested to also sentence Kingfisher Airlines and Vijay Mallya, to avoid delay. Not withstanding absence of Vijay Mallya, the court can sentence and impose fine against Vijay Mallya,” Reddy submitted. “Entire country knows where he (Mallya) is staying...he may not come back. It will take years to bring him back to India. At least fine can be imposed against the company,” he further said.